We are voting AGAINST on this proposal.
Our reasoning is that such an initiative should start smaller and with a smaller budget, allowing time to iterate and make clear objectives, see results then scale up the program over time.
We should take example from other successful DAOs where service providers have small budgets and are aligned with the overall growth of the DAO, then paid for results.
For example, 25 million ABR is over $10 million. That is more than all of the non-technical service providers at Aave DAO are paid combined.
While we are quite supportive of initiatives that help to set strategic direction for the DAO, we believe these do not need to be expensive coordination programs run by a single group. Instead, they should be lower budget programs over shorter time periods that can prove success.