Thanks to Entropy for elaborate and Castlecap for review this exercise on Unifying Arbitrum DAO’s Vision, Mission, and Goals - #5 by CastleCapital.
I’m in favor of the proposal. I believe the phased approach sets a clear path for Arbitrum DAO (ADA) to develop shared, flexible strategic goals that can keep up with market trends and tech demands.
Also, the focus on financial sustainability is key for ADA to remain competitive and aligned with the ecosystem’s long-term needs. You also mention the potential to build a strong and coherent identity for ADA, which is crucial for attracting new developers and strengthening the community. This level of clarity and purpose offers a competitive edge over other rollup projects, solidifying Arbitrum as a leader in scalability and decentralization within the blockchain space.
I only have one question: What will be the process for adjusting or reevaluating ADA’s long-term goals if there are major shifts in the market or technology?