Proposal: An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO
Type: Snapshot, ended Aug 22, 2024
Vote: Against
Reasoning: Voted against for procedural reasons, watching for this to be resubmitted.
Proposal: Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System.
Type: Snapshot, ended Aug 22, 2024
Vote: For
Reasoning: We believe that this program has been beneficial to the DAO, and without it the DAO would suffer from a lack of engagement and less variety in viewpoints. We’re looking forward to the next iteration of the program in version 1.1. As a note, we are opted into this program.
Proposal: Should the DAO Create COI & Self Voting Policies?
Type: Snapshot, ended Aug 22, 2024
Vote: We voted for on Disclosure Policy.
Rationale: We believe that this can give important context on why entities voted a certain way. As this goes forward, we would like to see more guidelines on what this would include, and how disputes around it would be resolved.
Proposal: ArbitrumDAO Off-site
Type: Snapshot, ended Aug 22, 2024
Vote: For
Rationale: We’re open to exploring this idea more, but are not committing to supporting a proposal that might come from this.
Proposal: Should the DAO Default to using Shielded Voting for Snapshot Votes?
Type: Snapshot, ended Aug 22, 2024
Vote: For Elections Only
Rationale: We’re open to experimenting with this and believe it can be useful in election processes, but are not convinced it’s needed or would be appropriate for all votes just yet.
Proposal: Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum
Type: Snapshot, ended Aug 22, 2024
Vote: For
Rationale: We voted for this at the temp check stage as we believe that treasury diversification is essential for growing the DAO further and developing long term sustainability. We also trust in the expertise that Karpatkey would bring and the fact that the program is non-custodial and can be halted gives an extra layer of reassurance. We expect more discussion around this topic before an onchain vote.