Adjust the Voting Power of the Arbitrum Community Pool & Ratify the Agentic Governance Pivot
We voted to reduce the delegation down to 0 here. While we found the initial design compelling, we felt that the pivot to agentic governance was far enough from the original proposal that it should start fresh. We’d also like to note that 100k is still a large delegation in relation to some other active delegates.
Wind Down the MSS + Transfer Payment Responsibilities to the Arbitrum Foundation
We voted for on this. This is just another part of the DAO’s transition to a more efficient entity. We have some concerns around centralization and accountability, but feel this is an unavoidable byproduct of the path the DAO has chosen to follow. We hope that this function is turned over to OpCo in the future.
Reallocate Redeemed USDM Funds to STEP 2 Budget
Voted for, this seems largely procedural. The funds should continue to be used to further the DAO’s goals in its RWA programs.
Updating the OpCo Foundation’s Operational Capability
We intended to vote for on this, but at the time of writing we don’t have all the signatures necessary and may not before the vote closes. Our rationale is here:
Let’s improve our governance forum with three proposals.app feature integrations
We intended to vote for on this, but at the time of writing we don’t have all the signatures necessary and may not before the vote closes. We weren’t comfortable with the original cost, but feel that the reduced ask could be workable. We only find one of the proposed features compelling for our use, but the team has indicated that they are willing to iterate on the proposed ideas to make them more useful for a wider range of delegates. We’re also hoping that this would allow the DAO to leverage the expertise, and possibly the data, of the team to help others build tools for the forum.
DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP) onchain vote
We voted for, mostly for the same reasons as the snapshot stage. There is still a lot of ambiguity in this proposal which we’re not entirely comfortable with, specifically around measuring success, and a lack of formal mechanisms for the DAO’s feedback. However, we recognize that Entropy feels they need the flexibility to be able to adjust the program as they see fit and defining those things now may hinder them in some way later. We’re relying on the ability to clawback funds as our protection here.