Voted FOR.
As discussed in length here MSS for Arbitrum - Communication Thread (Arbitrum Multisig Support Service) - #9 by tamara I saw first hand how the MSS underperformed in terms of accountability and actually lost the DAO money.
Hence I am very in favor of a new approach with more ownership and accountability. This being said, I would like to see more details on the following phases
Payment Responsibilities are sitting with the AF
- Who (and how many) will be in charge of signing within the AF?
- Who will project manage this from the AF side (being the ultimate responsible party)?
- How will the signers interact with the initiatives (to avoid the issue we had with the MSS of no one claiming responsibilities)?
- What OpSec trainings will be given?
Payment Responsibilities moving to OpCo
- What needs to be in place on the OpCo side to trigger the transfer of responsibilities (e.g., how many employees ramped up for how long?)?
- Questions 3 & 4 from above