First, we’d like to thank Entropy for bringing forward this proposal.
We are voting AGAINST the proposal to sunset the MSS and transfer its responsibilities to the Arbitrum Foundation. We share the centralization concerns raised by GFX Labs [here] and believe that approving this change could set an unhealthy precedent: if operational challenges justify bypassing decentralized structures now, similar shortcuts may be taken when issues arise within OpCo in the future.
In our view, the strongest version of this proposal would have introduced a restructured MSS, with reduced compensation, improved treasury risk management (e.g. stablecoin conversion), and a clearly defined transition path to OpCo. We are also interested in seeing suggested Plan B [here], as @Cattin mentioned. which may offer a more balanced approach.
While we recognize the tension between decentralization and operational efficiency, we believe the value at risk here does not justify compromising decentralization. Until OpCo is fully operational and accountable to the DAO, we view MSS—even with its limitations—as the more transparent and decentralized option.
We encourage the proposers to return with an amended version that retains the MSS structure while addressing funding constraints through leaner operations and clearer safeguards.