Zeptimus Delegate Communication Thread

[Zeptimus]

[Non-constitutional][RFC] ARB Incentives: User Acquisition for dApps & Protocols

Feedback

[Non-constitutional][RFC] ARB Incentives: User Acquisition for dApps & Protocols

Thanks for the detailed proposal. The data showing that 0% of protocols know their LTV and only 21% know their CAC is exactly whats wrong with this space. Projects are just burning money without tracking results. I like the KPI approach and specially the idea that if you only achieve 60% of KPIs you only get 60% of funding. Thats some skin in the game right there! But instead of spreading resources thin, why not identify the few projects that could actually bring NEW users to Arbitrum? Im talk…

Snapshot

[Non-constitutional][RFC] ARB Incentives: User Acquisition for dApps & Protocols

I vote against on this proposal. I would like it to be a smaller experiment using existing grant programs in Arbitrum first. I’m also hesitant to vote in favor until we first align with the mission and vision of Arbitrum. When that is clear, we will have an easier road to make decisions.

[Non-constitutional][RFC] ARB Incentives: User Acquisition for dApps & Protocols

There is this page where we can see all the grants of Arbitrum: Arbitrum — Grants. I believe the Arbitrum Foundation Grant Program coming soon is the best fit for this type of proposal. Great job on putting this proposal together! I appreciate the thought and effort you’ve put into aligning it with Arbitrum’s goals. In my view, we need a clearer roadmap to determine what to prioritize first. I also prefer to see a smaller pilot first and, if successful, scale it bigger.