February voting and rationale will be updated in this post over the course of the month.
Voted FOR Nova fee swap from timeboost.
We have voted on chain for the following proposals.
Voted FOR on STEP 2.0 continuation, as signaled with the snapshot vote and with no change in rationale.
Voted AGAINST creating OpCo. We have provided feedback in the relevant form thread:
We voted AGAINST the Stylus extension, just like we voted against the original proposal.
We voted AGAINST the Growth Circles Event Proposal. Our rationale is that this is continued unnecessary spending that is better served under specific service provider or intiative budgets that already exist.
We voted FOR the ArbOS version 40 proposal as it is an important technical upgrade to the network.
We voted FOR the Arbitrum Audit Program. While the budget is likely excessive, if the DAO is to spend on things, best that is spending on enhancing security across the network and supporting builders.
We voted AGAINST the Stylus grant increase during the on-chain vote, following our previous rationale presented above.
Voting rationale and feedback from March is summarized here:
TMC Proposal we voted FOR doing both the ARB and the Stablecoin strategy. We think both are compelling and are excited to see further development of useful uses for the arbitrum treasury. Compared to the usual costly proposals, this one should add some value to the DAO.
We voted against the Increase for Stylus, per our previous comments that the Stylus Grant program seemed extremely costly without clear goals, deliverables or metrics for success.
Sky Custom Gateway, we voted FOR. Working with Sky and the team there to grow USDS across Arbitrum is a simple way to get further TVL on the network and continue to be a leader in DeFi space.
GMC Preferred allocations, we voted FOR. This is similarly a good proposal that will bring some earnings to the DAO and is at the forefront of treasury management work using DeFi.
Timeboost adoption, we voted FOR following our previous rationale during the snapshot phase.
Governance bootcamp, we voted FOR. Even though this was voted down, we are supportive of more activities that will get new governance actors involved in the ecosystem.
Arbitrum audit program, we voted FOR. Security is top priority here even though the budgets seemed high, we are ok spending money for improved security in the ecosystem.