[Non-consitutional]: Top-up for Hackathon Continuation Program
I support this proposal as an exception.
Earlier in December, we agreed on a program for funding projects after the hackathon.
As far as I understand, it is AF that is responsible for the fact that it delayed the exchange of ARB tokens for stables for so long, and the drop turned out to be significant.
Projects participating in the hackathon and which should receive their funds for the development of ARbitrum should not suffer from this.
Although it is claimed that additional funds are not needed, in fact, these funds would have been taken from the treasury as soon as they returned from the old program. Therefore, we must consider that we are taking these funds from the treasury and we must treat this accordingly.
At first, it seems that this amount is small, but given that they initially took 252,000 ARB, and now the amount required is $90,000, then in fact, more than doubling the funds for this initiative is required (300,000 ARB)
The second part of the proposal suits me because this committee was created specifically for stables and how else would it deal with the remains of stables?
Vote: Yes to both
Platform: Snapshot