Kuiclub Delegate Communication Thread

Vote type: Snapshot

Link: [Snapshot] [Non-Constitutional] Treasury Management v1.2

Vote: Against

Rationale: I don’t support this proposal, it should be revised with more communication and feedback to protect the interests of the community.

After reading everyone’s comments and feedbacks, I do find some problem areas. 26M ARB and 7,500 ETH at one time is too risky, so I suggest to pilot the project on a small scale first, and then expand the allocation of funds after verifying the effect. The proposal is not clear enough about the use of funds and the supervision of committee members, and the details of regular reports, which need to be further clarified. the salaries of TMC and GMC compared with the salaries of other members of the DAO may lead to internal conflicts and disputes, and the content of the proposal design is too important. It should be revised with more communication and feedback. Safeguard the interests of the community.

comment:[Non-Constitutional] Treasury Management v1.2 - #20 by kuiclub