Lampros Labs DAO Delegate Communication Thread

[Euphoria]

Snapshot Votes

---

1. Adopt a Delegate Code of Conduct & Formalize Operations
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal in Snapshot Voting.

This proposal will help make the Arbitrum DAO more organized by setting clear rules for delegates and creating a respectful space where everyone’s voice is valued equally.

@Entropy

@Nyx

Regarding weighted voting, while it has benefits, it also carries the risk of skewed voting outcomes based on individual perceptions, potentially undermining objectivity. Are you proposing that weighted voting be applied universally to all proposal types, or is it intended specifically for elections?

We are proposing weighted voting for only elections, not for all proposal types.

The question around weighted voting, which we raised earlier, was addressed in the discussion, which resolved our main concern.

---

Tally Votes

---

1. (V2) Arbitrum Research & Development Collective
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal on Tally.

After reviewing the foundation established by ARDC in V1, we currently see no alternative that can fulfill its role as effectively. This continuation will undoubtedly strengthen ArbitrumDAO’s research and development efforts.

Rest our overall thoughts remain the same as expressed in our rationale during the Snapshot voting.

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting 100% for funding with 1.73M USDC + Council.

The ARDC addresses key areas of risk, security, and research for the DAO, which are crucial for its continued success. We’ve closely followed the research and security reports, and they have guided many of our decisions and votes.

At this time, we don’t see any other alternative that can fulfill the role of the ARDC as effectively. We hope to see more long-term reports focused on the growth and direction of the DAO.

Additionally, more clarity on who can request work, how requests are made, and the rationale behind approvals would be beneficial for the community.

---

2. Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025
   Voted - FOR
   Reason -

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal on Tally.

Attending key industry events is important for Arbitrum, as past events have proven valuable alongside those managed by the Foundation. This budget proposal, planned, should help prevent last-minute rushes due to the current 4-week confirmation period.

Rest our overall thoughts remain the same as expressed in our rationale during the Snapshot voting.

@Euphoria

The following reflects the views of the Lampros Labs DAO governance team, composed of @Blueweb, @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

We are voting FOR this proposal.

It is important for Arbitrum to be present at key industry events. In the past, events like GovHack have played a vital role alongside those managed by the Foundation. However, we’ve observed that the 4-week confirmation time has caused last-minute rushes for proposals, which this well-planned budget should help avoid.

We trust ADPC, Disruption Joe, and Entropy to smoothly transition the responsibility of organizing these events to the OpCo once it is fully operational.

Before we move to Tally, we have one point that needs clarification. Regarding the service providers, will they need a Snapshot vote to get funds approved by the DAO, or will members be able to approve the funds directly? Understanding this process will help ensure third-party providers stay motivated to organize events for the DAO.