Larva Delegate Communication Thread

September Voting Summary 2024-08-31T16:00:00Z - 2024-09-29T16:00:00Z

Snapshot

1.Voting 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Constitutional] Extend Delay on L2Time Lock - Voted For

I totally support the proposal because it’s beneficial to improve the security of Arbitrum network.

My comments in original proposal

2.Voting 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] STIP-Bridge Operational Budget - Voted For

I votded FOR because this is a reasonable cost!

3.Voting 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Replace Oversight Committee with MSS] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon - Voted For

This is a very interesting proposal. I see a lot of arguments. In fact, I think this proposal can be implemented without much cost after it is passed, so it is possible to conduct an experiment, continue if the effect is good, and stop if the effect is not good. I will support it.

My comments in original proposal

4.Voting 2024-09-05T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] ArbitrumDAO Procurement Committee Phase II - Voted Yes extend

ADPC has done a lot of outstanding work for Arbitrum DAO over the past few months, and I am very grateful to it. In fact, I fully support the proposal, because a good thing needs to be sustainable, and it makes sense to have the necessary budget to accomplish it. I have carefully reviewed the budget mentioned in the proposal, and I think it is relatively reasonable, and there is no over-exaggeration.

My comments in original proposal

5.Voting 2024-09-05T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Pyth Network] Arbitrum LTIPP Extension Request - Voted For

LTIPP has significantly contributed to Pyth’s development, which is evident to all. It is entirely reasonable for Pyth to apply for an extension of the LTIPP, especially since the budget is not excessively large, which is commendable. I always believe that for a business organization to succeed, it must strive to control costs—achieving more with less has always been my guiding principle. Therefore, I fully support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

6.Voting 2024-09-05T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum - Voted For

This proposal is fantastic—RARI’s arrival will greatly boost the development of Arbitrum. Although the current NFT market is quite sluggish, I believe NFTs will experience a resurgence in the near future. To seize the next wave of the NFT boom, it’s crucial to have reliable builders of NFT infrastructure. The RARI team has been deeply involved in this field since the early days of NFTs, which makes them particularly valuable. I fully support this proposal, and it is entirely necessary for the Arbitrum network to make reasonable technical adjustments to better integrate with them.

My comments in original proposal

7.Voting 2024-09-06T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Synthetix LTIP Grant Extension Request - Voted For

Similar to Pyth, Synthetix has performed well in the LTIPP, benefiting both the protocol itself and the Arbitrum network significantly. Initially, I had some reservations about the 900,000 ARB budget request, as it’s not a small amount, especially since I firmly believe in the principle of achieving more with less. However, I later learned that the LTIPP had already allocated a 2 million ARB budget for Synthetix, and this proposal is merely requesting the remaining unspent portion. With that understanding, I no longer have any objections, and I support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

8.Voting 2024-09-07T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Fund the Stylus Sprint - Voted For

Stylus is very important to the Arbitrum ecosystem, and it is necessary to motivate developers. So I voted FOR!

My comments in original proposal

9.Voting 2024-09-11T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Aave DAO] LTIPP Grant Extension Request - Voted For

As the largest DeFi lending protocol, AAVE has a large number of users and complex data. In order to ensure security and justice, it is completely understandable to extend the time for distributing rewards, and the proposal does not involve any new budget, so I fully support it!

My comments in original proposal

10.Voting 2024-09-11T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [ Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy - Voted collect bids in ARB and burn

I don’t know much about the underlying technology, but I have always been in favor of technological advances that can improve the fairness and efficiency of the network, and this proposal will greatly improve the user’s transaction experience, so I’m all for it! And collecting bids in ARB And burn is a great idea!

My comments in original proposal

11.Voting 2024-09-12T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Terms of Tenure for STEP program manager - Voted 6 months from available funds

This is an interesting proposal, I wonder why no one has proposed to lower the budget by saying that the budget exceeded $174,000 when the ARB went up to $2.4? When the proposals in the Arbitrum DAO involves ARB, why not use ARB as the standard currency? If ARB prices fluctuate and proposals have to be remade, wouldn’t the Arbitrum DAO be a lot of duplication? Based on this consideration, I do not support a new supplementary budget or even reelection.

My comments in original proposal

12.Voting 2024-09-12T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] ArbitrumDAO Off-site - Voted #1 IRL/Conference/Scholarships

Although I’m personally more of an online enthusiast and rarely participate in offline activities, I have to admit that occasional offline events indeed help strengthen community cohesion and advance Arbitrum’s mass adoption. So I fully support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

13.Voting 2024-09-18T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] GovHack Devcon in Bangkok - Hack Humanity - Voted For

I am very happy to see Arbitrum DAO’s emphasis on Government, which shows that Arbitrum DAO is an extraordinary organization with a long-term vision. I would love to see offline events, in fact, I would love to see them in every major country in the world. I fully support this proposal!

My comments in original proposal

14.Voting 2024-09-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] G [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget - Voted For

I support this proposal. Arbitrum is currently facing fierce competition, with many competitors rushing to offer incentives to attract ecosystem projects. For example, Zksync is trying to poach TreasureDAO, the largest and most renowned game and NOT native project on Arbitrum. The challenge is serious, and to remain competitive, it is essential for the Arbitrum Foundation to retain sufficient funds.

My comments in original proposal

15.Voting 2024-09-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [ G [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum DAO Delegate Incentive Program - Voted For DIP V1.5

The past six months of the Delegate Incentive Program have demonstrated that it is indeed an effective governance plan, even though I personally have not received rewards every month. Nevertheless, the program has successfully motivated most delegates. Although the incentives are not large, they serve as recognition of the delegates’ work. No one wants their efforts to go unnoticed or unappreciated, and excellent work deserves positive feedback. So I fully support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

16.Voting 2024-09-25T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Non-Constitutional] Whitelist Infura Nova Validator - Voted whitelist infura validator

This is a proposal about technology, forgive me for not being too professional in this area.

The proposal mentions that Infura’s verification node is already running in the Nova network, but it was not previously whitelisted due to a slip-up during testing. Note that Infura should have been whitelisted, so I think now there is not much need for further complex discussion.

On the other hand, Infura is known to be one of the most active infrastructure providers in the industry and has already supported the Arbitrum One network, so extending it to Arbitrum Nova as soon as possible is desirable and in the interest of the entire Arbitrum DAO.

So I fully support this proposal and look forward to Infura’s continued contribution to the Arbitrum ecosystem.

My comments in original proposal

17.Voting 2024-09-26T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Research on context and retention - Voted FOR

I have to say, I really love this proposal! It aligns with the field I’m currently dedicated to, although my work is not as systematic or well-structured.I’ve only been supporting some new startups within my area of interest.

This proposal aims to help new users entering the Arbitrum ecosystem to understand everything about Arbitrum better and faster. In fact, this not only holds significance for Arbitrum but also for Ethereum and all L2s. Education is always a field that requires long-term investment in any organically growing ecosystem. Moreover, I noticed that this proposal doesn’t require budget, as the team has already funded by other sources.

So, i fully support this proposal. And if there’s any help needed from me or ANDAO in the future, welcome to DM me.

My comments in original proposal

18.Voting 2024-09-26T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO - Voted FOR - Use ENS Txt Records

This is exactly what Arbitrum DAO urgently needs. Being able to describe its operational mechanism and governance processes in a transparent and standardized way is a sign of a DAO’s maturity. For instance, from the beginning, ANDAO has emphasized openness and transparency. All of our decisions require voting, and profits are shared among all community members. Of course, many of our decisions haven’t been put on-chain due to a lack of funding. But Arbitrum DAO is different. Arbitrum DAO has both the ability and the necessity to put all rules and information on-chain, achieving full decentralization. This will greatly enhance the DAO’s transparency and the trust of its participants. So I totally support this proposal!

My comments in original proposal

Tally

1.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

I’ve voted FOR! It’s important for the Arbitrum ecosystem to keep thriving!

My reasons in snapshot

2.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Tally] ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

I’ve voted for this proposal. The proposal introduces ARB staking, which can unlock additional utility for the ARB token and align governance incentives more effectively. By experimenting with staking, Arbitrum can gather valuable data to refine the model, potentially leading to a sustainable mechanism that benefits the entire ecosystem.

My reasons in snapshot

3.Voting 2024-08-26T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

4.Voting 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z

[Tally] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

5.Voting 2024-09-22T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

ADPC has done a lot of outstanding work for Arbitrum DAO over the past few months, and I am very grateful to it. In fact, I fully support the proposal, because a good thing needs to be sustainable, and it makes sense to have the necessary budget to accomplish it. I have carefully reviewed the budget mentioned in the proposal, and I think it is relatively reasonable, and there is no over-exaggeration.

My reasons in snapshot

6.Voting 2024-09-23T16:00:00Z

[Tally] UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship - Voted Against

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

It looks like a good proposal, but the reality is that there is very little benefit for the Arbitrum DAO beyond spending a lot of fund. I have always been opposed to such proposals, preferring to fund projects that are already in the Arbitrum ecosystem for a long time, rather than some nee external projects. So I will vote Against.

My reasons in snapshot

7.Voting 2024-09-23T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

I totally support the proposal because it’s beneficial to improve the security of Arbitrum network.

My reasons in snapshot