Larva Delegate Communication Thread

Voting 2024-09-22T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

ADPC has done a lot of outstanding work for Arbitrum DAO over the past few months, and I am very grateful to it. In fact, I fully support the proposal, because a good thing needs to be sustainable, and it makes sense to have the necessary budget to accomplish it. I have carefully reviewed the budget mentioned in the proposal, and I think it is relatively reasonable, and there is no over-exaggeration.

My reasons in snapshot

Voting 2024-09-23T16:00:00Z

[Tally] UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship - Voted Against

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

It looks like a good proposal, but the reality is that there is very little benefit for the Arbitrum DAO beyond spending a lot of fund. I have always been opposed to such proposals, preferring to fund projects that are already in the Arbitrum ecosystem for a long time, rather than some nee external projects. So I will vote Against.

My reasons in snapshot

Voting 2024-09-23T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

I totally support the proposal because itā€™s beneficial to improve the security of Arbitrum network.

My reasons in snapshot

June Voting Summary 2024-05-31T16:00:00Z - 2024-06-29T16:00:00Z

Snapshot

1.Voting 2024-05-31T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund - Voted FOR

This is a very necessary proposal, and I fully support it.

My comments in original proposal

2.Voting 2024-05-31T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30) - Voted FOR

This proposal gives the DAO faster, easier accessibility to these funds, and should make bookkeeping simpler. This has important implications for DAO governance. Iā€™ve voted FOR!

My comments in original proposal

3.Voting 2024-05-31T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30) - Voted FOR

This proposal enables developers to write smart contracts in new programming languages, like Rust, that are more efficient than Solidity smart contracts. This has important implications for the Arbitrum ecosystem to thrive. Iā€™ve voted FOR!

My comments in original proposal

4.Voting 2024-05-31T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30) - Voted FOR

This proposal enables account abstraction wallets to cheaply verify a type of signature widely used in passkeys and secure enclaves. This has important implications for the Arbitrum to achieve mass adoption. Iā€™ve voted FOR!

My comments in original proposal

5.Voting 2024-06-05T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Election of STEP Program Manager - Voted particula.io 50%/ steakhouse.finance 50%

I will examine these applications carefully and cast my vote.

My comments in original proposal

6.Voting 2024-06-05T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Ventures Initiative - Voted FOR [Full scope]

This proposal is good for the Arbitrum ecosystem to enhance its venture development.

My comments in original proposal

7.Voting 2024-06-06T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] AIP: BoLD - permissionless validation for Arbitrum - Voted FOR

Good to improve the influence of Arbitrum ecosystem.

8.Voting 2024-06-06T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Bond sentiment. - Voted FOR

This is a big step for Arbitrum DAO! So I voted for!

9.Voting 2024-06-06T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Operational cost sentiment. - Voted FOR

Iā€™ve voted FOR! Itā€™s important for the Arbitrum ecosystem to keep thriving!

10.Voting 2024-06-15T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [ Pilot Stage ā€“ Treasury Backed Vaults research and development - Voted FOR

Would support this proposal

  1. Electing a Security Council adds a robust layer of oversight, crucial for protecting the network from vulnerabilities and attacks.
  2. The councilā€™s authority to enact emergency changes ensures quick responses to critical issues, enhancing network resilience.
  3. Having trusted and experienced individuals in key positions fosters greater confidence within the community regarding the networkā€™s integrity and governance.

My comments in original proposal

11.Voting 2024-06-15T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [ [Non-Constitutional] Betting on Builders: Infinite Launchpad Proposal - Voted Against

I would against the proposal because:

  1. $10 million is a significant amount, and there is a risk of misallocation or inefficiency.
  2. Heavy reliance on established partners might overshadow smaller, innovative contributors.
  3. Lack of detailed sustainability plans post-Q4 2025 could pose risks to ongoing support and development.

My comments in original proposal

12.Voting 2024-06-20T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] ArbitrumHub Evolution: The Next Step in Streamlining Information Access and Raising Awareness for Arbitrum DAO - Voted FOR

I would support the proposal for the ArbitrumHub Evolution. The proposal aims to streamline information access, raise awareness, and foster community engagement within the ArbitrumDAO ecosystem. The key reasons for support include:

  1. Improved information access
  2. Incentivizing contributions and participation.
  3. Clear workflow and financial transparency.

My comments in original proposal

13.Voting 2024-06-20T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Multisig Support Service (MSS) Elections - Voted JoJo 25%/ Castle labs 25%/ Disruption Joe 25%/ Alex Lumley 25%

Tally

1.Voting 2024-06-08T00:00:00Z

[Tally] Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

July Voting Summary 2024-06-30T16:00:00Z - 2024-07-30T16:00:00Z

Snapshot

1.Voting 2024-07-05T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Approval of STEP committee recommendations - Voted FOR

Iā€™ve voted for this proposal due to its balanced approach to ecosystem growth and risk management, alongside the clear selection criteria used for allocation.

My comments in original proposal

2.Voting 2024-07-10T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Improving Predictability in Arbitrum DAOā€™s Operations - Voted Improving predictability

Thank you for this proposal. I believe its intention is good. However, there might be another issue: some proposals could be overlooked. Because many delegates tend to focus only on proposals on Snapshot and Tally, rather than regularly checking posts in the forum.

My comments in original proposal

3.Voting 2024-07-16T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Pilot for a Questbook Jumpstart fund for problem definition and DAO improvement - Voted FOR

I support the proposal. It aims to create a more efficient and inclusive process for addressing and solving the DAOā€™s challenges.

My comments in original proposal

4.Voting 2024-07-17T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Gaming Catalyst Program (GCP) Council Voting - Voted David Bolger

David Bolger is very professional in this domain! So I voted for him!

5.Voting 2024-07-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO - Voted do not fund

This is a good proposal, but it would have been better to have some more detailed data and KPIs.

My comments in original proposal

6.Voting 2024-07-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Furucomboā€™s Misuse of Funds - Voted FOR Ban Furucombo from the ARB

Fairness is a fundamental principle of the DAO, and some cheaters deserve to be punished.

My comments in original proposal

7.Voting 2024-07-25T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Change Arbitrum Expansion Program to allow deployments of new Orbit chains on any blockchain - Voted FOR Any blockchain network

I support the proposal to allow deployments of new Orbit chains on any blockchain. This initiative can enhance Arbitrumā€™s tech stack adoption and open new revenue streams. It will also promote the EVM, benefiting Ethereum by driving its adoption.

My comments in original proposal

Tally

1.Voting 2024-07-04T00:00:00Z

[Tally] [Non-Constitutional] - Subsidy Fund Proposal from the ADPC - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

2.Voting 2024-07-09T00:00:00Z

[Tally] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Pilot Phase: Arbitrum Ventures Initiative - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

3.Voting 2024-07-28T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [Constitutional] ArbOS 31 ā€œBiancaā€ (Stylus, RIP-7212 Support, Nova Fee Router) - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

4.Voting 2024-07-29T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS) - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

August Voting Summary 2024-07-31T16:00:00Z - 2024-08-30T16:00:00Z

Snapshot

1.Voting 2024-07-17T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Gaming Catalyst Program (GCP) Council Voting - Voted David Bolger

David Bolger is very professional in this domain! So I voted for him!

2.Voting 2024-08-02T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Non-constitutional] Incentives Detox Proposal - Voted FOR

I fully support this proposal. The rationale behind it is solidā€”taking a deliberate pause to analyze and optimize future incentive programs based on comprehensive data and stakeholder feedback ensures that resources are used effectively. This approach aligns with long-term ecosystem growth and sustainability.

My comments in original proposal

3.Voting 2024-08-09T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance - Voted FOR

Iā€™ve voted for this proposal. The proposal introduces ARB staking, which can unlock additional utility for the ARB token and align governance incentives more effectively. By experimenting with staking, Arbitrum can gather valuable data to refine the model, potentially leading to a sustainable mechanism that benefits the entire ecosystem.

My comments in original proposal

4.Voting 2024-08-09T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Transparency and Standardized Metrics for Orbit Chains - Voted FOR

I support the proposal for implementing transparency and standardized metrics for Orbit chains. This initiative would provide clear, data-driven insights into the performance of Orbit chains, improving accountability and decision-making within the Arbitrum ecosystem. By offering standardized metrics on platforms like growthepie.xyz, developers and DAO members can make informed choices, optimizing resource allocation and governance. This transparency will also boost confidence among stakeholders, driving further adoption and growth of Orbit chains, ultimately benefiting the entire Arbitrum network.

My comments in original proposal

5.Voting 2024-08-09T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard - Voted FOR

I support the proposal to create the ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard. This tool will enhance transparency and data-driven decision-making within the Arbitrum ecosystem by providing a clear and comprehensive view of governance activities.

My comments in original proposal

6.Voting 2024-08-14T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Should the DAO Default to using Shielded Voting for Snapshot Votes? - Voted FOR

Iā€™ve voted for this proposal. Shielded voting enhances voter privacy, protecting members from potential coercion or vote-buying, which can lead to more genuine and independent voting outcomes. While it may reduce transparency to some extent, the benefits of safeguarding the integrity of the voting process outweigh this drawback. By prioritizing privacy, the DAO can ensure that decisions truly reflect the communityā€™s will, fostering a healthier and more resilient governance system.

My comments in original proposal

7.Voting 2024-08-15T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System. - Voted FOR

The past six months of practice have shown that this incentive program is highly effective and significant for delegate voting. To ensure a smooth transition, it makes perfect sense to extend this program. I fully support this proposal!

My comments in original proposal

8.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] ArbitrumDAO Off-site - Voted FOR

Although Iā€™m personally more of an online enthusiast and rarely participate in offline activities, I have to admit that occasional offline events indeed help strengthen community cohesion and advance Arbitrumā€™s mass adoption. So I fully support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

9.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO - Voted FOR

Iā€™m not very familiar with the technical details, but based on the data and content presented in this proposal, achieving its goals seems essential for the long-term development of Arbitrum DAO. The proposal appears beneficial without incurring additional costs, so I fully support it.

My comments in original proposal

10.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum - Voted Against

Diversifying DAO assets is indeed important, but I donā€™t consider it an urgent matter. ARB can effectively serve as the base asset for Arbitrum DAO. Moreover, 250M is an excessively large amount, and the 1% management fee is too high. This could lead to new issues, such as the management team focusing on their own income rather than the DAOā€™s interests. Therefore, I am inclined to oppose this proposal for now.

My comments in original proposal

11.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Should the DAO Create COI & Self Voting Policies? - Voted FOR: strict self-voting policy

Actually, I donā€™t think the delegate should be allowed to vote on his own proposal, especially when the proposal involves a large amount of fund and the delegate has a lot of votes, because I canā€™t believe that the delegate is completely selfless. So I think Strict Self-Voting Policy is necessary.

My comments in original proposal

12.Voting 2024-08-24T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship - Voted Against

It looks like a good proposal, but the reality is that there is very little benefit for the Arbitrum DAO beyond spending a lot of fund. I have always been opposed to such proposals, preferring to fund projects that are already in the Arbitrum ecosystem for a long time, rather than some nee external projects. So I will vote Against.

My comments in original proposal

Tally

1.Voting 2024-08-06T00:00:00Z

[Tally] Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO - Voted FOR

I was against it when I voted in snapshot, but now I have changed my mind.

This is important for Arbitrum DAO to keep going, so I voted FOR.

My reasons in snapshot

2.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

Iā€™ve voted FOR! Itā€™s important for the Arbitrum ecosystem to keep thriving!

My reasons in snapshot

3.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Tally] ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

Iā€™ve voted for this proposal. The proposal introduces ARB staking, which can unlock additional utility for the ARB token and align governance incentives more effectively. By experimenting with staking, Arbitrum can gather valuable data to refine the model, potentially leading to a sustainable mechanism that benefits the entire ecosystem.

My reasons in snapshot

4.Voting 2024-08-26T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool ā€” Event Horizon - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

September Voting Summary 2024-08-31T16:00:00Z - 2024-09-29T16:00:00Z

Snapshot

1.Voting 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Constitutional] Extend Delay on L2Time Lock - Voted For

I totally support the proposal because itā€™s beneficial to improve the security of Arbitrum network.

My comments in original proposal

2.Voting 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] STIP-Bridge Operational Budget - Voted For

I votded FOR because this is a reasonable cost!

3.Voting 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Replace Oversight Committee with MSS] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool ā€” Event Horizon - Voted For

This is a very interesting proposal. I see a lot of arguments. In fact, I think this proposal can be implemented without much cost after it is passed, so it is possible to conduct an experiment, continue if the effect is good, and stop if the effect is not good. I will support it.

My comments in original proposal

4.Voting 2024-09-05T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] ArbitrumDAO Procurement Committee Phase II - Voted Yes extend

ADPC has done a lot of outstanding work for Arbitrum DAO over the past few months, and I am very grateful to it. In fact, I fully support the proposal, because a good thing needs to be sustainable, and it makes sense to have the necessary budget to accomplish it. I have carefully reviewed the budget mentioned in the proposal, and I think it is relatively reasonable, and there is no over-exaggeration.

My comments in original proposal

5.Voting 2024-09-05T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Pyth Network] Arbitrum LTIPP Extension Request - Voted For

LTIPP has significantly contributed to Pythā€™s development, which is evident to all. It is entirely reasonable for Pyth to apply for an extension of the LTIPP, especially since the budget is not excessively large, which is commendable. I always believe that for a business organization to succeed, it must strive to control costsā€”achieving more with less has always been my guiding principle. Therefore, I fully support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

6.Voting 2024-09-05T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum - Voted For

This proposal is fantasticā€”RARIā€™s arrival will greatly boost the development of Arbitrum. Although the current NFT market is quite sluggish, I believe NFTs will experience a resurgence in the near future. To seize the next wave of the NFT boom, itā€™s crucial to have reliable builders of NFT infrastructure. The RARI team has been deeply involved in this field since the early days of NFTs, which makes them particularly valuable. I fully support this proposal, and it is entirely necessary for the Arbitrum network to make reasonable technical adjustments to better integrate with them.

My comments in original proposal

7.Voting 2024-09-06T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Synthetix LTIP Grant Extension Request - Voted For

Similar to Pyth, Synthetix has performed well in the LTIPP, benefiting both the protocol itself and the Arbitrum network significantly. Initially, I had some reservations about the 900,000 ARB budget request, as itā€™s not a small amount, especially since I firmly believe in the principle of achieving more with less. However, I later learned that the LTIPP had already allocated a 2 million ARB budget for Synthetix, and this proposal is merely requesting the remaining unspent portion. With that understanding, I no longer have any objections, and I support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

8.Voting 2024-09-07T00:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Fund the Stylus Sprint - Voted For

Stylus is very important to the Arbitrum ecosystem, and it is necessary to motivate developers. So I voted FOR!

My comments in original proposal

9.Voting 2024-09-11T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Aave DAO] LTIPP Grant Extension Request - Voted For

As the largest DeFi lending protocol, AAVE has a large number of users and complex data. In order to ensure security and justice, it is completely understandable to extend the time for distributing rewards, and the proposal does not involve any new budget, so I fully support it!

My comments in original proposal

10.Voting 2024-09-11T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [ Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy - Voted collect bids in ARB and burn

I donā€™t know much about the underlying technology, but I have always been in favor of technological advances that can improve the fairness and efficiency of the network, and this proposal will greatly improve the userā€™s transaction experience, so Iā€™m all for it! And collecting bids in ARB And burn is a great idea!

My comments in original proposal

11.Voting 2024-09-12T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Terms of Tenure for STEP program manager - Voted 6 months from available funds

This is an interesting proposal, I wonder why no one has proposed to lower the budget by saying that the budget exceeded $174,000 when the ARB went up to $2.4? When the proposals in the Arbitrum DAO involves ARB, why not use ARB as the standard currency? If ARB prices fluctuate and proposals have to be remade, wouldnā€™t the Arbitrum DAO be a lot of duplication? Based on this consideration, I do not support a new supplementary budget or even reelection.

My comments in original proposal

12.Voting 2024-09-12T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] ArbitrumDAO Off-site - Voted #1 IRL/Conference/Scholarships

Although Iā€™m personally more of an online enthusiast and rarely participate in offline activities, I have to admit that occasional offline events indeed help strengthen community cohesion and advance Arbitrumā€™s mass adoption. So I fully support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

13.Voting 2024-09-18T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] GovHack Devcon in Bangkok - Hack Humanity - Voted For

I am very happy to see Arbitrum DAOā€™s emphasis on Government, which shows that Arbitrum DAO is an extraordinary organization with a long-term vision. I would love to see offline events, in fact, I would love to see them in every major country in the world. I fully support this proposal!

My comments in original proposal

14.Voting 2024-09-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] G [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundationā€™s Strategic Partnerships Budget - Voted For

I support this proposal. Arbitrum is currently facing fierce competition, with many competitors rushing to offer incentives to attract ecosystem projects. For example, Zksync is trying to poach TreasureDAO, the largest and most renowned game and NOT native project on Arbitrum. The challenge is serious, and to remain competitive, it is essential for the Arbitrum Foundation to retain sufficient funds.

My comments in original proposal

15.Voting 2024-09-19T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [ G [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum DAO Delegate Incentive Program - Voted For DIP V1.5

The past six months of the Delegate Incentive Program have demonstrated that it is indeed an effective governance plan, even though I personally have not received rewards every month. Nevertheless, the program has successfully motivated most delegates. Although the incentives are not large, they serve as recognition of the delegatesā€™ work. No one wants their efforts to go unnoticed or unappreciated, and excellent work deserves positive feedback. So I fully support this proposal.

My comments in original proposal

16.Voting 2024-09-25T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Non-Constitutional] Whitelist Infura Nova Validator - Voted whitelist infura validator

This is a proposal about technology, forgive me for not being too professional in this area.

The proposal mentions that Infuraā€™s verification node is already running in the Nova network, but it was not previously whitelisted due to a slip-up during testing. Note that Infura should have been whitelisted, so I think now there is not much need for further complex discussion.

On the other hand, Infura is known to be one of the most active infrastructure providers in the industry and has already supported the Arbitrum One network, so extending it to Arbitrum Nova as soon as possible is desirable and in the interest of the entire Arbitrum DAO.

So I fully support this proposal and look forward to Infuraā€™s continued contribution to the Arbitrum ecosystem.

My comments in original proposal

17.Voting 2024-09-26T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Research on context and retention - Voted FOR

I have to say, I really love this proposal! It aligns with the field Iā€™m currently dedicated to, although my work is not as systematic or well-structured.Iā€™ve only been supporting some new startups within my area of interest.

This proposal aims to help new users entering the Arbitrum ecosystem to understand everything about Arbitrum better and faster. In fact, this not only holds significance for Arbitrum but also for Ethereum and all L2s. Education is always a field that requires long-term investment in any organically growing ecosystem. Moreover, I noticed that this proposal doesnā€™t require budget, as the team has already funded by other sources.

So, i fully support this proposal. And if thereā€™s any help needed from me or ANDAO in the future, welcome to DM me.

My comments in original proposal

18.Voting 2024-09-26T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO - Voted FOR - Use ENS Txt Records

This is exactly what Arbitrum DAO urgently needs. Being able to describe its operational mechanism and governance processes in a transparent and standardized way is a sign of a DAOā€™s maturity. For instance, from the beginning, ANDAO has emphasized openness and transparency. All of our decisions require voting, and profits are shared among all community members. Of course, many of our decisions havenā€™t been put on-chain due to a lack of funding. But Arbitrum DAO is different. Arbitrum DAO has both the ability and the necessity to put all rules and information on-chain, achieving full decentralization. This will greatly enhance the DAOā€™s transparency and the trust of its participants. So I totally support this proposal!

My comments in original proposal

Tally

1.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

Iā€™ve voted FOR! Itā€™s important for the Arbitrum ecosystem to keep thriving!

My reasons in snapshot

2.Voting 2024-08-19T16:00:00Z

[Tally] ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

Iā€™ve voted for this proposal. The proposal introduces ARB staking, which can unlock additional utility for the ARB token and align governance incentives more effectively. By experimenting with staking, Arbitrum can gather valuable data to refine the model, potentially leading to a sustainable mechanism that benefits the entire ecosystem.

My reasons in snapshot

3.Voting 2024-08-26T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool ā€” Event Horizon - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

4.Voting 2024-09-01T00:00:00Z

[Tally] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool ā€” Event Horizon - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

5.Voting 2024-09-22T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

ADPC has done a lot of outstanding work for Arbitrum DAO over the past few months, and I am very grateful to it. In fact, I fully support the proposal, because a good thing needs to be sustainable, and it makes sense to have the necessary budget to accomplish it. I have carefully reviewed the budget mentioned in the proposal, and I think it is relatively reasonable, and there is no over-exaggeration.

My reasons in snapshot

6.Voting 2024-09-23T16:00:00Z

[Tally] UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship - Voted Against

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

It looks like a good proposal, but the reality is that there is very little benefit for the Arbitrum DAO beyond spending a lot of fund. I have always been opposed to such proposals, preferring to fund projects that are already in the Arbitrum ecosystem for a long time, rather than some nee external projects. So I will vote Against.

My reasons in snapshot

7.Voting 2024-09-23T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

I totally support the proposal because itā€™s beneficial to improve the security of Arbitrum network.

My reasons in snapshot

October Voting Summary 2024-09-30T16:00:00Z - 2024-10-30T16:00:00Z

Snapshot

1.Voting 2024-09-25T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] [Non-Constitutional] Whitelist Infura Nova Validator - Voted whitelist infura validator

This is a proposal about technology, forgive me for not being too professional in this area.

The proposal mentions that Infuraā€™s verification node is already running in the Nova network, but it was not previously whitelisted due to a slip-up during testing. Note that Infura should have been whitelisted, so I think now there is not much need for further complex discussion.

On the other hand, Infura is known to be one of the most active infrastructure providers in the industry and has already supported the Arbitrum One network, so extending it to Arbitrum Nova as soon as possible is desirable and in the interest of the entire Arbitrum DAO.

So I fully support this proposal and look forward to Infuraā€™s continued contribution to the Arbitrum ecosystem.

My comments in original proposal

2.Voting 2024-09-26T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Research on context and retention - Voted FOR

I have to say, I really love this proposal! It aligns with the field Iā€™m currently dedicated to, although my work is not as systematic or well-structured.Iā€™ve only been supporting some new startups within my area of interest.

This proposal aims to help new users entering the Arbitrum ecosystem to understand everything about Arbitrum better and faster. In fact, this not only holds significance for Arbitrum but also for Ethereum and all L2s. Education is always a field that requires long-term investment in any organically growing ecosystem. Moreover, I noticed that this proposal doesnā€™t require budget, as the team has already funded by other sources.

So, i fully support this proposal. And if thereā€™s any help needed from me or ANDAO in the future, welcome to DM me.

My comments in original proposal

3.Voting 2024-09-26T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] An EIP-4824 powered daoURI for Arbitrum DAO - Voted FOR - Use ENS Txt Records

This is exactly what Arbitrum DAO urgently needs. Being able to describe its operational mechanism and governance processes in a transparent and standardized way is a sign of a DAOā€™s maturity. For instance, from the beginning, ANDAO has emphasized openness and transparency. All of our decisions require voting, and profits are shared among all community members. Of course, many of our decisions havenā€™t been put on-chain due to a lack of funding. But Arbitrum DAO is different. Arbitrum DAO has both the ability and the necessity to put all rules and information on-chain, achieving full decentralization. This will greatly enhance the DAOā€™s transparency and the trust of its participants. So I totally support this proposal!

My comments in original proposal

4.Voting 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] LTIPP Retroactive Community Funding Selections - Voted Do Not Fund

The various incentive programs and grants existing in Arbitrum DAO have already given sufficient rewards to these contributors, so I think it is not necessary to set up another LTIPP Retroactive Community Funding separately. So I voted donā€™t fund.

My comments in original proposal

5.Voting 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 - Voted Against

Itā€™s necessary to establish an event budget in advance for 2025 since the DAO has just approved a proposal for offline events. However, the question is, did we participate in these events mentioned for 2024, and what were the expenses and outcomes? I didnā€™t see clear data in the proposal. Without this information, how was the $1.5 million budget for this proposal determined? Iā€™m puzzled by this figure, and this is a key issue we often encounter when it comes to budget-related proposalsā€”we donā€™t know whether the amount is too much or too little. Therefore, I believe the proposer should provide supplementary data on the 2024 activities for the delegatesā€™ reference. So I voted Against.

My comments in original proposal

6.Voting 2024-10-17T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] (V2) Arbitrum Research & Development Collective - Voted Funded with 2.60M USDC + Council

The Arbitrum Research Development Collective [V1] has a proven role, so expanding [V2] should make sense. My only concern is that the onerous requirements will limit the creativity of council members. This question has been answered by @Immutablelawyer, and I think it is, as the lesser of two evils, and we need to continue to adjust our strategy as we develop. So I decided to support the proposal and vote for funded with 2.60M USDC + council.

My comments in original proposal

Tally

1.Voting 2024-09-22T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

ADPC has done a lot of outstanding work for Arbitrum DAO over the past few months, and I am very grateful to it. In fact, I fully support the proposal, because a good thing needs to be sustainable, and it makes sense to have the necessary budget to accomplish it. I have carefully reviewed the budget mentioned in the proposal, and I think it is relatively reasonable, and there is no over-exaggeration.

My reasons in snapshot

2.Voting 2024-09-23T16:00:00Z

[Tally] UPDATED - Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship - Voted Against

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

It looks like a good proposal, but the reality is that there is very little benefit for the Arbitrum DAO beyond spending a lot of fund. I have always been opposed to such proposals, preferring to fund projects that are already in the Arbitrum ecosystem for a long time, rather than some nee external projects. So I will vote Against.

My reasons in snapshot

3.Voting 2024-09-23T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Constitutional AIP - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

I totally support the proposal because itā€™s beneficial to improve the security of Arbitrum network.

My reasons in snapshot

4.Voting 2024-10-03T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundationā€™s Strategic Partnerships Budget - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

I support this proposal. Arbitrum is currently facing fierce competition, with many competitors rushing to offer incentives to attract ecosystem projects. For example, Zksync is trying to poach TreasureDAO, the largest and most renowned game and NOT native project on Arbitrum. The challenge is serious, and to remain competitive, it is essential for the Arbitrum Foundation to retain sufficient funds.

My reasons in snapshot

5.Voting 2024-10-04T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

This proposal is fantasticā€”RARIā€™s arrival will greatly boost the development of Arbitrum. Although the current NFT market is quite sluggish, I believe NFTs will experience a resurgence in the near future. To seize the next wave of the NFT boom, itā€™s crucial to have reliable builders of NFT infrastructure. The RARI team has been deeply involved in this field since the early days of NFTs, which makes them particularly valuable. I fully support this proposal, and it is entirely necessary for the Arbitrum network to make reasonable technical adjustments to better integrate with them.

My reasons in snapshot

6.Voting 2024-10-04T16:00:00Z

[Tally] ArbitrumDAO strategic ā€œOff-siteā€ (online) updated proposal - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

Although Iā€™m personally more of an online enthusiast and rarely participate in offline activities, I have to admit that occasional offline events indeed help strengthen community cohesion and advance Arbitrumā€™s mass adoption. So I fully support this proposal.

My reasons in snapshot

7.Voting 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum DAO Delegate Incentive Program - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

The past six months of the Delegate Incentive Program have demonstrated that it is indeed an effective governance plan, even though I personally have not received rewards every month. Nevertheless, the program has successfully motivated most delegates. Although the incentives are not large, they serve as recognition of the delegatesā€™ work. No one wants their efforts to go unnoticed or unappreciated, and excellent work deserves positive feedback. So I fully support this proposal.

My reasons in snapshot

8.Voting 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Fund the Stylus Sprint - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

Stylus is very important to the Arbitrum ecosystem, and it is necessary to motivate developers. This fund is very necessary, is an important means for arbitrum to maintain competitiveness in the future! So I voted FOR!

My reasons in snapshot

Voting 2024-10-03T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundationā€™s Strategic Partnerships Budget - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

I support this proposal. Arbitrum is currently facing fierce competition, with many competitors rushing to offer incentives to attract ecosystem projects. For example, Zksync is trying to poach TreasureDAO, the largest and most renowned game and NOT native project on Arbitrum. The challenge is serious, and to remain competitive, it is essential for the Arbitrum Foundation to retain sufficient funds.

My reasons in snapshot

Voting 2024-10-04T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

This proposal is fantasticā€”RARIā€™s arrival will greatly boost the development of Arbitrum. Although the current NFT market is quite sluggish, I believe NFTs will experience a resurgence in the near future. To seize the next wave of the NFT boom, itā€™s crucial to have reliable builders of NFT infrastructure. The RARI team has been deeply involved in this field since the early days of NFTs, which makes them particularly valuable. I fully support this proposal, and it is entirely necessary for the Arbitrum network to make reasonable technical adjustments to better integrate with them.

My reasons in snapshot

Voting 2024-10-04T16:00:00Z

[Tally] ArbitrumDAO strategic ā€œOff-siteā€ (online) updated proposal - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

Although Iā€™m personally more of an online enthusiast and rarely participate in offline activities, I have to admit that occasional offline events indeed help strengthen community cohesion and advance Arbitrumā€™s mass adoption. So I fully support this proposal.

My reasons in snapshot

Voting 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

[Tally] [Non-Constitutional] Arbitrum DAO Delegate Incentive Program - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

The past six months of the Delegate Incentive Program have demonstrated that it is indeed an effective governance plan, even though I personally have not received rewards every month. Nevertheless, the program has successfully motivated most delegates. Although the incentives are not large, they serve as recognition of the delegatesā€™ work. No one wants their efforts to go unnoticed or unappreciated, and excellent work deserves positive feedback. So I fully support this proposal.

My reasons in snapshot

Voting 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

[Tally] Fund the Stylus Sprint - Voted FOR

Maintain my reasons for voting at snapshot.

Stylus is very important to the Arbitrum ecosystem, and it is necessary to motivate developers. This fund is very necessary, is an important means for arbitrum to maintain competitiveness in the future! So I voted FOR!

My reasons in snapshot

Voting 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] LTIPP Retroactive Community Funding Selections - Voted Do Not Fund

The various incentive programs and grants existing in Arbitrum DAO have already given sufficient rewards to these contributors, so I think it is not necessary to set up another LTIPP Retroactive Community Funding separately. So I voted donā€™t fund.

My comments in original proposal

Voting 2024-10-10T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 - Voted Against

Itā€™s necessary to establish an event budget in advance for 2025 since the DAO has just approved a proposal for offline events. However, the question is, did we participate in these events mentioned for 2024, and what were the expenses and outcomes? I didnā€™t see clear data in the proposal. Without this information, how was the $1.5 million budget for this proposal determined? Iā€™m puzzled by this figure, and this is a key issue we often encounter when it comes to budget-related proposalsā€”we donā€™t know whether the amount is too much or too little. Therefore, I believe the proposer should provide supplementary data on the 2024 activities for the delegatesā€™ reference. So I voted Against.

My comments in original proposal

2 Likes

Voting 2024-10-17T16:00:00Z

[Snapshot] (V2) Arbitrum Research & Development Collective - Voted Funded with 2.60M USDC + Council

The Arbitrum Research Development Collective [V1] has a proven role, so expanding [V2] should make sense. My only concern is that the onerous requirements will limit the creativity of council members. This question has been answered by @Immutablelawyer, and I think it is, as the lesser of two evils, and we need to continue to adjust our strategy as we develop. So I decided to support the proposal and vote for funded with 2.60M USDC + Council.

My comments in original proposal