The previous 2024 participation brought significant benefits to Arbitrum DAO, we shouldn’t miss this opportunity in 2025. And the budget is very small actually.
I completely agree with the view that ‘as it currently stands, the Arbitrum DAO is generally unable to move swiftly when it requires specialized contributors to execute a strategy, for which there isn’t a straightforward and low-friction approach, with these processes typically requiring a vast amount of effort from the supply side instead of being driven by the demand side.’ I very hope OpCo can address this pain point.
I was concerned that a 34M ARB would put a lot of pressure on the market, to the detriment of ARB holders, and OpCo decided to take a linear release to minimize the impact on the market. Overall, the pros of the proposal outweigh the cons, so I voted For.
We need to minimize the negative impacts on ecosystem caused by sharp fluctuations in asset prices in the early years. To diversify Arbitrum DAOs treasury into real world assets is very important for the long-term stable development of the Arbitrum ecosystem. So I voted For.
This is a proposal about technology, forgive me for not being too professional in this area.
The proposal mentions that Infura’s verification node is already running in the Nova network, but it was not previously whitelisted due to a slip-up during testing. Note that Infura should have been whitelisted, so I think now there is not much need for further complex discussion.
On the other hand, Infura is known to be one of the most active infrastructure providers in the industry and has already supported the Arbitrum One network, so extending it to Arbitrum Nova as soon as possible is desirable and in the interest of the entire Arbitrum DAO.
So I fully support this proposal and look forward to Infura’s continued contribution to the Arbitrum ecosystem.
This is a proposal about technology, forgive me for not being too professional in this area.
The proposal mentions that Infura’s verification node is already running in the Nova network, but it was not previously whitelisted due to a slip-up during testing. Note that Infura should have been whitelisted, so I think now there is not much need for further complex discussion.
On the other hand, Infura is known to be one of the most active infrastructure providers in the industry and has already supported the Arbitrum One network, so extending it to Arbitrum Nova as soon as possible is desirable and in the interest of the entire Arbitrum DAO.
So I fully support this proposal and look forward to Infura’s continued contribution to the Arbitrum ecosystem.
We need to minimize the negative impacts on ecosystem caused by sharp fluctuations in asset prices in the early years. To diversify Arbitrum DAOs treasury into real world assets is very important for the long-term stable development of the Arbitrum ecosystem. So I voted For.