Voting 2024-10-31T16:00:00Z
[Tally]
Establishing a DAO Events Budget for 2025 - Voted FOR
Changed my vote on snapshot.
In the Snatshot stage, there were no details about the events for 2024 in the proposal, so I voted against it. Now, it seems that the details have been added in the Tally stage, so I am now voting in favor!
Voting 2024-10-31T16:00:00Z
[Tally]
(V2) Arbitrum Research & Development Collective - Voted FOR
Maintain my reasons on snapshot.
The Arbitrum Research Development Collective [V1] has a proven role, so expanding [V2] should make sense. My only concern is that the onerous requirements will limit the creativity of council members. This question has been answered, and I think it is, as the lesser of two evils, and we need to continue to adjust our strategy as we develop. So I decided to support the proposal and vote for funded with 2.60M USDC + council.
Voting 2024-10-31T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Adopt a Delegate Code of Conduct & Formalize Operations - Voted For
I carefully reviewed the entire content, and I generally agree with the points made. Delegates indeed need to follow a certain code of conduct, especially those participating in DIP and receiving incentives. I donāt want to see a situation where someone benefits from the system but undermines it at the same time. It would be terrible if some Delegates kept receiving compensation from Arbitrum DAO but continuously opposed its collective decisions, both inside and outside the community. So I voted for!
Voting 2024-10-31T16:00:00Z
[Tally]
Security Council Election #2 - Voted my all votes to Griff Green
I know Griff Green is a nice guy who are building Giveth. He is a technical expert who has made outstanding contributions to the development of the Arbitrum network. So I believe he can do this job perfectly!
Voting 2024-11-16T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] [Non-Constitutional] Treasury Management v1.2 - Voted Against
I donāt think my concerns were solved by the new proposal version:
How will 15M ARB be swapped to stablecoins within 3 months? Will it be sold directly on CEXs or via OTC? Could this cause significant market volatility? Given the current liquidity shortage, 15M ARB represents a large selling pressure. If not handled properly, it could harm all ARB holders and the overall interests of Arbitrum DAO. Is there a detailed plan in place?
How can we ensure the security of funds during transfers and subsequent management? Will the ARB and ETH stay on-chain, or be moved to CEXs? If transferred to CEXs, maintaining full transparency will be challenging. What contingency plans are in place in case of a hack or theft?
So Iām voting against for now.
Voting 2024-11-20T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Restitution For Extensively Delayed ArbitrumDAO Minigrant Winners - Voted Against
The similar issues are widespread across Arbitrum DAO since ARB has dropped 70% over the past six months. I think they asked for providing reasonable compensation is understandable, but it may seem unfair to other teams facing similar situations. If the original reward was set in ARB, then I donāt think compensation is necessary, as the high volatility of early-stage tokens should be a common understanding among all Crypto practitioners.
So Iām voting against for now.
Voting 2024-11-24T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Hackathon Continuation Program - Voted In Favor, yes onchain mechanism
Many great projects on Ethereum were born in hackathons. Supporting startup projects has always been something Iāve been involved in, and I believe it has long-term significance for the Arbitrum ecosystem. And Iāve deeply discussed this proposal with Daniel. Thatās why I fully support this proposal.
My comments in original proposal
Voting 2024-11-29T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] [Non-consitutional] User Research: Why build on Arbitrum? - Voted Arbitrum + 2 others (SOL + OP)
Researching why developers choose to build on Arbitrum, what attracts them, and what causes some to leave for other ecosystems is a crucial topic. This helps us understand what developers truly need and aids Arbitrum DAO in defining its future development path. And the budget is not too much. So I fully support this proposal.
December Voting Summary 2024-11-30T16:00:00Z - 2024-12-30T16:00:00Z
Snapshot
1.Voting 2024-11-30T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] [Non-consitutional] User Research: Why build on Arbitrum? - Voted Arbitrum + 2 others (SOL + OP)
Researching why developers choose to build on Arbitrum, what attracts them, and what causes some to leave for other ecosystems is a crucial topic. This helps us understand what developers truly need and aids Arbitrum DAO in defining its future development path. And the budget is not too much. So I fully support this proposal.
My comments in original proposal
My comments in original proposal
2.Voting 2024-11-30T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Designing and operating the reporting and information function - Voted Against
I like this proposal but seem it wasnāt fully discussed in forum before it was submitted to Snpshot. Most of Delegateās questions are unanswered by writing including mine. So I vote for against right now.
My comments in original proposal
3.Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Arbitrum D.A.O. Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3 - Voted For
The Grant Program Seasons 1 and 2 were executed effectively. With the market warming up, I believe Orbit is entering a phase of rapid growth. Therefore, itās crucial to launch the Grant Program Season 3 as soon as possible. I vote in renew 5 domains (adding orbit chain)!
My comments in original proposal
4.Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp - Voted For
This would greatly enhance the professional governance skills of DAO members. In fact, many Delegates might also benefit from such training, not just those who are newly joining the DAO. So I voted for!
My comments in original proposal
5.Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Supervisory Council Election - Voted For ZER8
No one knows ZER8 better than I do. He is one of the people I respect most in Arbitrum DAO. He possesses a wealth of skills and exceptional work capabilities, treats others with kindness, and is always tirelessly working for the DAOās mission without expecting anything in return. I honestly cannot think of anyone more suitable for this position than him.
My comments in original proposal
6.Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Research Election - Voted For Llama and Castle
Among all the candidates, no one demonstrates a stronger understanding of research than Llama and Castle. I am highly impressed by their background, proposed hourly rate, and scope of work. Their application stands out as far more competitive compared to others charging $500 or even $700 per hour, especially considering their consistent and significant contributions to the Arbitrum DAO. With their reasonable hourly rate and proven track record, I firmly believe they are the perfect fit for this position.
My comments in original proposal
7.Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Risk Election - Voted For Nethermind
The Nethermind team has extensive experience in the Web3 security space. I have personally used the security tools they developed, and they are exceptionally user-friendly. Additionally, considering their very reasonable hourly rate, I believe they are the most suitable candidate for this position.
My comments in original proposal
8.Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Security Election - Voted For OpenZeppelin
Iām not very familiar with either candidate, but based on their application forms, OpenZeppelin appears to have a more robust background and experience. Therefore, I believe they are better suited for this position.
My comments in original proposal
9.Voting 2024-12-12T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Unifying Arbitrumās Mission, Vision, Purpose (MVP) - Voted For
Aligning Arbitrumās mission, vision, and purpose (MVP) is indeed crucial, and this is a highly forward-thinking and comprehensive approach. It would be a terrible thing if there were Delegates enjoying the benefits of ArbitrumDAO but out there denigrating Arbitrum. So this proposal will slove this problem. And I believe this proposalās initiative will allow the Arbitrum DAO to prosper even more. So I voted For.
My comments in original proposal
10.Voting 2024-12-12T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Partner with ETH Bucharest 2025 - Voted For
The previous 2024 participation brought significant benefits to Arbitrum DAO, we shouldnāt miss this opportunity in 2025. And the budget is very small actually.
So I voted For with Poap $69,300.
My comments in original proposal
11.Voting 2024-12-12T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] OpCo ā A DAO-adjacent Entity for Strategy Execution - Voted For
I completely agree with the view that āas it currently stands, the Arbitrum DAO is generally unable to move swiftly when it requires specialized contributors to execute a strategy, for which there isnāt a straightforward and low-friction approach, with these processes typically requiring a vast amount of effort from the supply side instead of being driven by the demand side.ā I very hope OpCo can address this pain point.
I was concerned that a 34M ARB would put a lot of pressure on the market, to the detriment of ARB holders, and OpCo decided to take a linear release to minimize the impact on the market. Overall, the pros of the proposal outweigh the cons, so I voted For.
My comments in original proposal
Tally
1.Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Tally]
Treasury Management V1.2 - Voted Against
Maintain my reasons on snapshot.
I donāt think my concerns were solved by the new proposal version:
How will 15M ARB be swapped to stablecoins within 3 months? Will it be sold directly on CEXs or via OTC? Could this cause significant market volatility? Given the current liquidity shortage, 15M ARB represents a large selling pressure. If not handled properly, it could harm all ARB holders and the overall interests of Arbitrum DAO. Is there a detailed plan in place?
How can we ensure the security of funds during transfers and subsequent management? Will the ARB and ETH stay on-chain, or be moved to CEXs? If transferred to CEXs, maintaining full transparency will be challenging. What contingency plans are in place in case of a hack or theft?
So Iām voting against for now.
2.Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Tally]
Arbitrum Hackathon Builder Continuation Program - Voted For
Many great projects on Ethereum were born in hackathons. Supporting startup projects has always been something Iāve been involved in, and I believe it has long-term significance for the Arbitrum ecosystem. And Iāve deeply discussed this proposal with Daniel. Thatās why I fully support this proposal.
Voting 2024-11-30T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] [Non-consitutional] User Research: Why build on Arbitrum? - Voted Arbitrum + 2 others (SOL + OP)
Researching why developers choose to build on Arbitrum, what attracts them, and what causes some to leave for other ecosystems is a crucial topic. This helps us understand what developers truly need and aids Arbitrum DAO in defining its future development path. And the budget is not too much. So I fully support this proposal.
Voting 2024-11-30T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Designing and operating the reporting and information function - Voted Against
I like this proposal but seem it wasnāt fully discussed in forum before it was submitted to Snpshot. Most of Delegateās questions are unanswered by writing including mine. So I vote for against right now.
Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Arbitrum D.A.O. Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3 - Voted For
The Grant Program Seasons 1 and 2 were executed effectively. With the market warming up, I believe Orbit is entering a phase of rapid growth. Therefore, itās crucial to launch the Grant Program Season 3 as soon as possible. I vote in renew 5 domains (adding orbit chain)!
Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp - Voted For
This would greatly enhance the professional governance skills of DAO members. In fact, many Delegates might also benefit from such training, not just those who are newly joining the DAO. So I voted for!
Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Supervisory Council Election - Voted For ZER8
No one knows ZER8 better than I do. He is one of the people I respect most in Arbitrum DAO. He possesses a wealth of skills and exceptional work capabilities, treats others with kindness, and is always tirelessly working for the DAOās mission without expecting anything in return. I honestly cannot think of anyone more suitable for this position than him.
Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Research Election - Voted For Llama and Castle
Among all the candidates, no one demonstrates a stronger understanding of research than Llama and Castle. I am highly impressed by their background, proposed hourly rate, and scope of work. Their application stands out as far more competitive compared to others charging $500 or even $700 per hour, especially considering their consistent and significant contributions to the Arbitrum DAO. With their reasonable hourly rate and proven track record, I firmly believe they are the perfect fit for this position.
Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Risk Election - Voted For Nethermind
The Nethermind team has extensive experience in the Web3 security space. I have personally used the security tools they developed, and they are exceptionally user-friendly. Additionally, considering their very reasonable hourly rate, I believe they are the most suitable candidate for this position.
Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] ARDC (V2) Security Election - Voted For OpenZeppelin
Iām not very familiar with either candidate, but based on their application forms, OpenZeppelin appears to have a more robust background and experience. Therefore, I believe they are better suited for this position.
Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Tally]
Treasury Management V1.2 - Voted Against
Maintain my reasons on snapshot.
I donāt think my concerns were solved by the new proposal version:
How will 15M ARB be swapped to stablecoins within 3 months? Will it be sold directly on CEXs or via OTC? Could this cause significant market volatility? Given the current liquidity shortage, 15M ARB represents a large selling pressure. If not handled properly, it could harm all ARB holders and the overall interests of Arbitrum DAO. Is there a detailed plan in place?
How can we ensure the security of funds during transfers and subsequent management? Will the ARB and ETH stay on-chain, or be moved to CEXs? If transferred to CEXs, maintaining full transparency will be challenging. What contingency plans are in place in case of a hack or theft?
So Iām voting against for now.
Voting 2024-12-05T16:00:00Z
[Tally]
Arbitrum Hackathon Builder Continuation Program - Voted For
Many great projects on Ethereum were born in hackathons. Supporting startup projects has always been something Iāve been involved in, and I believe it has long-term significance for the Arbitrum ecosystem. And Iāve deeply discussed this proposal with Daniel. Thatās why I fully support this proposal.
Voting 2024-12-12T16:00:00Z
[Snapshot] Unifying Arbitrumās Mission, Vision, Purpose (MVP) - Voted For
Aligning Arbitrumās mission, vision, and purpose (MVP) is indeed crucial, and this is a highly forward-thinking and comprehensive approach. It would be a terrible thing if there were Delegates enjoying the benefits of ArbitrumDAO but out there denigrating Arbitrum. So this proposal will slove this problem. And I believe this proposalās initiative will allow the Arbitrum DAO to prosper even more. So I voted For.
