Reserved to share feedback on voting
Hey @Matt_StableLab, not sure if I missed something in other posts, but this felt like the best place to ask this…
Will there be adjustments to the Tally vote to account for delegates who voted improperly (4+ votes for the Advisor role, 6+ votes for the Council). There seemed to be a lot of that happening, some of which from large enough delegates it may have materially altered the results.
Hi, I just looked into this and can at least say that ignoring all votes that voted for 4 or more choices would not have changed the results.
This shows all votes that specified more than 3 choices (some had “Abstain” as a 4th choice).
(Only the voters within the top 50-voting-powers are shown directly, the other 3+ votes are aggregated in “Rest”.)
This election was not at all conducted in a proper way no clear guidelines no transparency nothing it felt like the authors just want to rush into things and get the money in their wallets.
Hey @Bob-Rossi,
Thanks for pointing this out. We have gone through and found all improper votes. Below we have displayed all voters with more than 50K ARB that voted for too many applicants. After removing these improper votes the results from both elections remain the same.
Advisor
| Address | Votes | Voted For |
|---|---|---|
| 0xb5B069370Ef24BC67F114e185D185063CE3479f8 | 7M | Boardroom, Serious People, SEEDLatam Gov, JoJo |
| 0xAD16ebE6FfC7d96624A380F394cD64395B0C6144 | 1.3M | Boardroom, Castle Capital, SEEDLatam Gov, JoJo |
| 0x560b03B06eF02B24F994e470d949008cda5e1841 | 924k | Boardroom, Castle Capital, SEEDLatam Gov, JoJo |
| 0x400e3aB48b2cCd2420EC04BA0ee9c94Bb54a0b1C | 424k | Everyone |
| 0x070341aA5Ed571f0FB2c4a5641409B1A46b4961b | 280k | Boardroom, Castle Capital, SEEDLatam Gov, JoJo |
| 0xBEC643BD5b7F5e9190617CA4187ef0455950C51C | 120k | Boardroom, Castle Capital, SEEDLatam Gov, JoJo |
| 0x7973E953321f99cEa25b3CCEEeAA7d83dA827d77 | 60k | Everyone |
| 0xaAFDd78aF4f90AB649b94E5ef8430d27174a084C | 58k | Everyone |
| 0xC560d89d663b31110e164354C6377d8845ed4db3 | 56k | Everyone |
Vote Count After Removing Invalid Votes
JoJo - 145M ARB
SEEDLatam Gov - 129M
Castle Capital - 111M
Serious People - 102M
Council
| Address | Votes | Voted For |
|---|---|---|
| 0xd4382Aa8F0e173C53A80ba5d8345e46a183F84Ed | 1.9M | 404, dumbird, GFX, GMX, The Rollup, Wintermute |
| 0x400e3aB48b2cCd2420EC04BA0ee9c94Bb54a0b1C | 424k | Everyone |
| 0x80071b39aA896aa12240c5194E42661D671bDFB2 | 81k | 404, GFX, GMX, The Rollup, Ian Campbell, Karel Vuong, Karpatkey, Wintermute |
| 0x7973E953321f99cEa25b3CCEEeAA7d83dA827d77 | 60k | Everyone but 1isla.eth |
| 0xaAFDd78aF4f90AB649b94E5ef8430d27174a084C | 58k | Everyone |
| 0xC560d89d663b31110e164354C6377d8845ed4db3 | 56k | Everyone |
Vote Count After Removing Invalid Votes
GFX Labs: 113M
404 DAO: 81M
Wintermute: 80M
Karel Vuong: 75M
GMX: 74M
Joseph [Immutable Lawyer]: 73M
Ehy Matt I will answer this as well since with @Bob-Rossi we were chatting yday about it.
His goal was not to discuss the election result. It was to asses the behavior of voters in relationship to the tools we have.
We probably need a bit of a broader discussion, which is off topic to ltip but of which ltip is an example, about facilitating the “proper” behvaiour of voters through toothe right tools and the right setting of these tools.
@Matt_StableLab good to see the results were unaffected, thank you for checking that!
Like @JoJo had mentioned, I will probably be bringing up for discussion if the DAO has an appetite for formalizing standards for elections like this. Both with what tools do we have to prevent enforce proper voting by all delegates so we don’t have to worry about adjustments at the end, as well as if we need to make election results held until voting is closed. I think having the results open during the election can lead to voters weighting their decision towards affecting the final slot versus who they actually want to vote for.
When will the application period for DAOs start @Matt_StableLab
