Referring to the previous v1 report and comments, RIKA emphasized: help newbies navigate DAO and make meaningful contributions. It is not our intention to design a program to educate people on how DAO works. We are considering creating workshops and tutorials so that newcomers understand the specific needs of DAO.
The new V2 proposal does not clearly explain how the contributions and value of the 10 selected Fellows to the DAO will be measured, such as the number of proposals they contribute to or their governance activity level. Clear key performance indicators (KPIs) are essential.
Firstly, we should agree on implementing retrospective compensation policies for onboarding participants who invest significant time and effort to become active DAO members. However, I still have concerns: if, after extensive training, we are unable to retain these representatives, what would be the point of this initiative? I would like to hear your personal thoughts on this, Rika.