While we haven’t received a clear answer to the compensation structure in our comment below, we agree with the general direction of the concept and this proposal should go for an onchain vote. We also believe the DAO should pay governance analysts and program contributors, but there should be a compensation structure that is aligned with what the program can achieve with clear goal that comes with the KPIs. While being challenging to set the right KPIs to monitor the ongoing impact from the governance fellows, it’s critical to design the program to dare to address the ultimate issues that the DAO has.
I’ve voted for this proposal. I think that at the very least it will give us quality data about onboarding on Arbitrum at a price that, when seeing the budget of the DAO, feels reasonable. Again, the value of this lies partly in the reporting so I hope this will be high quality and communicated broadly.
I voted FOR on this proposal. As improvements for Tally, it would be interesting to see more protocols to work with the Governance Fellows (so we have this locked in before the proposal passes the onchain vote)
We are aware more clarity is needed on some areas before this proposal goes to an onchain vote but we were okay supporting this at least during this temp check stage. We agree with @NathanVDH re reporting as this would indeed be crucial in determining the success of this initiative.
Thank you so much @RikaGoldberg for putting together this amazing proposal
As a newbie in governance, I am interested in joining this initiative and seeing the outcome after two months
The question is, how do we register and also what is the selection process going to be like
I am also interested in helping out fine tuning the onboarding process and helping with marketing and socials
I also do think we can do so much more with the marketing and even making this into a full time educational hub
I am very willing to assist with this and look forward to working with you