[Non-Constitutional] ArbitrumHub Evolution: The Next Step in Streamlining Information Access and Raising Awareness for Arbitrum DAO

Blockworks Research will be voting AGAINST this proposal on Snapshot.

While we believe that there is undeniably significant value for a consolidated Hub for all ecosystem and DAO activities, the budgetary expenditure seems extensive. Especially Items 2 and 3 feel high. For example, the budget allocates $17,000 per month for “Collaboration, Meetings & Meetings Report” to seemingly cover the salaries of two positions, which assumedly aren’t full-time as the dedicated persons would have additional commitments as well. Some of the proposed focus areas also seem to overlap with existing initiatives.

We understand the importance of creating a consolidated place for governance and ecosystem initiatives, especially since Arbitrum-related information is split across the web. However, due to the high/unclear budgeting and an absent longer-term operational plan, we will be voting against this proposal.

We would recommend excluding Items 2 and 3 from the proposal, and more clearly indicating how many full-time employees and what roles are required for Items 1 & 4, as well as estimations of any other OpEx required now and in the long-term to maintain the Hub. Although this funding request is for six months, we believe it would be beneficial to include a long-term vision for the project and what the steady state expenses for the Hub might look like.

1 Like