[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Proposal for Maintenance and Continuous Enhancement of ArbitrumHub to Meet the Evolving Needs of the Arbitrum Ecosystem and DAO

Welcome to the Arbitrum Hub - your ultimate gateway to navigating the Arbitrum DAO Ecosystem! Here, you’ll find everything you need to dive into the world of Arbitrum DAO, from understanding its decentralized governance to exploring its vibrant community and innovative initiative.

This proposal is a revised version of our previous submission, incorporating feedback from all the delegates, where it was initially rejected due to budgetary concerns and the absence of clear KPIs. After months of research and careful consideration of the feedback, we are presenting this updated proposal.

Past Proposal: click here
Arbitrumhub Platform: Click Here

1. Abstract

The ArbitrumHub project emerged from over a year of active involvement in the Arbitrum ecosystem, during which we identified a critical need for a unified platform for ArbitrumDAO. Through extensive community engagement, research, and participation in DAO meetings, it became evident that new members, centralized organizations, participants from other DAOs, and young enthusiasts lacked a single point of reference for all developments within the ecosystem. To address this gap, we began laying the foundation of ArbitrumHub one year ago. With dedicated research, collaboration with key stakeholders, and a project team committed to design, development, and iteration, ArbitrumHub has evolved into a comprehensive resource at arbitrumhub.io.

Approximately eight months ago, we presented our initial findings and project report to the DAO, receiving strong support for the platform’s impact on the Arbitrum ecosystem. However, our initial proposal was not approved due to budgetary disagreements and the need for clearer metrics to assess ArbitrumHub’s outcomes. Accepting this result, we returned with a refined approach—supported by detailed research, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)—to align our proposal with the community’s expectations.

After five months of rigorous preparation, we are now presenting an updated proposal that includes a significantly reasonable budget, thoroughly justified metrics, and strategies to measure the platform’s impact. This proposal outlines the next steps for ArbitrumHub, detailing upcoming features, technical enhancements, and a comprehensive implementation timeline aimed at advancing the Arbitrum ecosystem.

2. Motivation

ArbitrumHub was created to address the critical need for a centralized resource hub within the ArbitrumDAO community. As the ecosystem expands, it becomes increasingly challenging to stay informed and connected. ArbitrumHub simplifies this process by offering a single, reliable source of essential information, structured in a way that is both accessible and comprehensive.

Our recent implementation of dedicated sections showcases our commitment to this vision, demonstrating how ArbitrumHub can effectively organize and present complex program information. This success serves as a model for handling future initiatives within the ecosystem. Our primary goal is to establish ArbitrumHub as the first point of contact for all new users entering the Arbitrum ecosystem, providing them with up-to-date information and resources.

ArbitrumHub aspires to become the community’s go-to destination for vital insights into ArbitrumDAO and its ongoing initiatives. By maintaining a unified platform, we ensure community members and external participants have access to updates, meeting details, and opportunities to engage with the ecosystem. This approach not only strengthens community involvement but also fosters a more informed and engaged Arbitrum ecosystem.

3. Rationale for DAO Approval

After our initial proposal did not pass, we ultimately decided to refine our platform internally, incorporate feedback from the DAO, and resubmit our proposal. This decision stems from our belief that ArbitrumHub’s impact is strategically aligned with the ArbitrumDAO’s goals, making DAO approval crucial to its success.

ArbitrumHub serves as the essential first point of contact for existing and new users in the Arbitrum ecosystem, consolidating scattered information and providing a continuously updated resource. Given the importance of this platform in fostering ecosystem cohesion and accessibility, we are seeking DAO approval to formalize ArbitrumHub’s role within the ArbitrumDAO structure.

Securing DAO support would allow us to designate ArbitrumHub as a DAO-backed platform, which we can publicly display in the About section on ArbitrumHub.io, reinforcing its credibility and trust within the ecosystem. Formal approval would also enable a closer working relationship with DAO program managers and delegates, establishing an ongoing feedback loop and creating a foundation for designing and implementing effective Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) with key stakeholders. This formalized connection ensures that ArbitrumHub remains aligned with the DAO’s strategic objectives, enhancing the platform’s long-term impact and value to the Arbitrum ecosystem.

4. Key Uses of ArbitrumHub

ArbitrumHub is a centralized and open-source platform designed to streamline user access to essential resources, real-time updates, and community engagement within the Arbitrum ecosystem. It addresses the need for a unified, easily navigable platform for new and existing users. Key functionalities include:

a. Real-Time Updates
Integrates the latest news and developments within the Arbitrum ecosystem, ensuring users have timely access to important updates.
b. Community Interaction and Events
Keeps the community informed about upcoming meetups, workshops, and events, promoting active participation and engagement.
c. Centralized Support and Resources
Provides dedicated support for platform-related queries and aggregates essential resources, such as developer tools and grant information, in one location.
d. Enhanced Visibility and Engagement
Leverages social media and newsletters to increase visibility and user engagement, keeping the community informed and involved.
e. Community Participation
Encourages active participation by offering educational resources, events, and opportunities for contribution, fostering ongoing community involvement.
f. Ambassador Program Highlights
Acts as a central directory for ambassador activities, allowing easy management and access to ambassador-related initiatives.

ArbitrumHub fills a crucial gap within the ArbitrumDAO by providing a centralized, up-to-date platform that simplifies onboarding and keeps users engaged. Initially, our team faced difficulties in accessing the necessary information to fully participate in the ecosystem, a challenge that many users encounter. ArbitrumHub eliminates these barriers, offering a seamless experience that will help attract and retain new members while fostering the continued growth of the ArbitrumDAO.

5. KPI and SOP Implementation

Based on feedback gathered from our previous proposal, we have conducted extensive research to establish refined Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that ensure the platform operates at peak efficiency while fostering community engagement. These structured objectives and workflows are designed to enhance operational productivity, promote transparency, and build a collaborative environment that values community input and open-source participation.


KPIs

The Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are established to monitor and enhance the performance of both internal operations and community engagement.

a. Weekly Newsletter Delivery

  • Objective: Keep registered profiles informed with weekly updates on platform developments and opportunities.
  • Deliverable: 52 newsletters per year.

b. Monthly Platform Audit Report

  • Objective: Conduct a comprehensive audit of platform updates, code modifications, content accuracy, design changes, sitemap adjustments, and other enhancements.
  • Deliverable: Submit 12, monthly audit reports to the DAO.

c. Monthly Program Review Check-ins

  • Objective: Ensure content accuracy across program-specific pages by initiating monthly review prompts with responsible program managers.
  • Deliverable: Formal content verification message each month (guided by SOP(a)).

d. Platform Enhancements

  • Objective: Integrate new sections and initiatives based on research findings or specific requests to enhance user experience.
  • Process: Follow SOP(b) for standardized assessment and implementation of updates.

e. Content and Meeting Archive Management

  • Objective: Maintain a repository of all meeting information, recordings, and critical strategic reports, such as the Monthly Token Flow Report.
  • Inclusion: Documented as part of the Monthly Platform Audit Report.

f. Social Media Management

  • Objective: Manage and engage the community through a dedicated Twitter account, focusing on consistent and relevant posting.
  • Deliverable: Average of 5 original posts per week.

g. User Analytics Dashboard

  • Objective: Monitor and analyze user activity and behavior on the platform through a dedicated analytics dashboard.
  • Tool: Hosted on Looker Studio for real-time insights (Arbitrum Hub Analytics Dashboard).

h. Bi-Monthly Platform Analytics Report

  • Objective: Provide in-depth reports on user interaction and analytics every two months, including actionable recommendations for platform enhancements.
  • Deliverable: Six reports annually, with follow-up action plans based on SOP(c).

i. Open Source Design Accessibility

  • Objective: Encourage community contributions and feedback by making Figma design files accessible for open-source collaboration.

j. Open Source Codebase Accessibility

  • Objective: Enable community engagement by providing access to the GitHub codebase, ensuring it is well-documented and professionally structured to support collaborative development.

Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

The SOPs ensure consistent platform updates, efficient enhancements, and data-driven improvements to maintain accuracy, relevance, and user engagement.

SOP(a): Monthly Program Review Check-ins

Deliverables: 12 Monthly Check-ins

Objective

To ensure the accuracy and relevance of information on program-specific pages through monthly content reviews with designated program managers.

Procedure

a. Monthly Review Initiation
Send a formal request to the designated program manager(s) each month using approved communication channels.
b. Content Verification
Confirm all information is up-to-date, accurate, and aligned with current program objectives.
c. Follow-up and Confirmation
If there is no response within 5 business days, send a reminder. Log the interaction and resulting actions.

Reporting

Summarize outcomes in the Monthly Platform Audit Report, detailing updates implemented or outstanding verification tasks.


SOP(b): Platform Enhancements Based on Research/Requests

Deliverables: As Required, Based on Research/Requests

Objective

To systematically manage and implement new sections and initiatives based on internal research findings or community requests.

Procedure

a. Request & Research Gathering
Collect enhancement requests and categorize by priority, impact, and feasibility.
b. Initial Assessment and Feasibility Analysis
Assess technical requirements, resource availability, and alignment with platform objectives.
c. Approval Process
Present prioritized enhancements to stakeholders for approval.
d. Implementation and Integration
Work with relevant teams to implement approved changes.

Documentation and Reporting

Document each enhancement and include a summary in the Monthly Platform Audit Report.


SOP(c): Bi-Monthly Platform Analytics Reporting and Iteration

Deliverables: 6 Bi-Monthly Analytics Reports

Objective

To generate insights into platform user behavior and interactions, enabling data-driven iterations to enhance user experience and engagement.

Procedure

a. Data Collection and Dashboard Monitoring
Continuously collect data on user interactions via the Analytics Dashboard.
b. Bi-Monthly Analysis
Conduct detailed analysis, identifying trends and friction points.
c. Report Preparation
Prepare formal reports summarizing findings and recommendations for improvements.

Action Plan and Implementation

  1. Action Plan Development
    Develop an action plan based on findings with specific changes.
  2. Stakeholder Review and Approval
    Present the action plan for feedback and approval.
  3. Implementation
    Implement approved changes, ensuring alignment with platform objectives.

Documentation and Follow-Up

Document all changes and include a summary of actions and progress in the bi-monthly analytics report.


5. Feedback Mechanism and Success Metrics

Feedback Mechanism

To foster continuous improvement and maintain alignment with community/DAO expectations, we have implemented a structured feedback mechanism integrated into our operational processes. This mechanism ensures that insights from users, stakeholders, and the broader community are systematically collected, evaluated, and acted upon.

Process

a. Community Engagement and Open Collaboration

  • Open Source Accessibility:
    • Figma design files and GitHub codebase are made publicly accessible, encouraging community contributions and feedback on design and development.
  • Social Media Outreach:
    • Through an active Twitter presence (average of 5 posts per week), we engage with users to gather suggestions and address concerns.

b. Regular Check-ins and Feedback Loops

  • Monthly Program Reviews (SOP(a)):
    • Monthly communication with program managers ensures that program-specific content remains relevant and accurate. Community feedback is incorporated into these reviews to address identified gaps or concerns.

c. Platform Analytics and User Behavior Insights

  • User Analytics Dashboard:
    • Hosted on Looker Studio, this dashboard provides real-time insights into user engagement and platform interaction.
  • Bi-Monthly Analytics Reports (SOP(c)):
    • These reports analyze user behavior trends, identify friction points, and propose actionable improvements. Follow-up plans based on these insights close the feedback loop.

d. Enhancements Based on Requests (SOP(b))

  • Requests from community members or DAO are evaluated for feasibility, prioritized by impact, and implemented after stakeholder approval. Outcomes are documented in the Monthly Platform Audit Report.

Success Metrics

The success of ArbitrumHub is evaluated using clearly defined metrics that align with the platform’s objectives. These metrics are linked to the KPIs and operational SOPs, ensuring measurable outcomes and accountability.

Performance Indicators

a. Content Accuracy and Timeliness

  • Verified through monthly program review check-ins (SOP(a)), ensuring all platform information is up-to-date and program-specific pages are accurate.

b. User Engagement and Retention

  • Tracked via the User Analytics Dashboard, with reports analyzing session durations, active users, and returning visitor rates.
  • Bi-monthly reports (SOP(c)) provide actionable recommendations to enhance engagement.

c. Platform Growth and Enhancement

  • Success is measured by the number of new sections or initiatives implemented based on research findings or community requests (SOP(b)).
  • Documented improvements are summarized in monthly audit reports.

d. Community Involvement

  • Increased contributions via open-source initiatives (e.g., GitHub codebase activity and Figma design suggestions).

e. Communication and Outreach

  • Delivery of 52 newsletters annually to registered profiles, maintaining an informed community.
  • Social media impact measured through consistent posting (average 5 posts/week) and engagement analytics.

By integrating these feedback mechanisms and success metrics, we ensure ArbitrumHub operates effectively, adapts to user needs, and fosters a collaborative and transparent environment.

6. Add-Ons: Enhancing Platform Functionality and User Engagement

To provide a comprehensive and dynamic experience for platform users, the following add-ons are proposed to address specific needs and enhance functionality:

a. Program-Specific Updates

  • Certain programs, such as the Security Subsidy Fund, may require time-sensitive actions, like submitting applications within a two-week period.
  • A pop-up notification system will be designed and implemented to alert users shortly before the program’s commencement and while it is live, ensuring timely awareness and participation.

b. Daily Meetings Notification

  • To support collaboration and communication, a daily meeting pop-up will be displayed prominently on the homepage.
  • Notifications will be aligned with EST timings and tailored for optimal visibility and engagement.

c. Events Page

  • A dedicated Events Page will be developed to provide users with a centralized hub for all upcoming and ongoing events.
  • The design will include system links, event descriptions, and real-time updates, fostering community involvement and accessibility.

d. Analytics Dashboard

  • A comprehensive Analytics Dashboard will be created using looker studio to deliver actionable insights on users behaviour.
  • The dashboard will present user-friendly data visualizations on program performance, grant activities, and community metrics, empowering informed decision-making.

e. CMS and Chatbot Integration

  • To enhance user support and streamline content management, a Content Management System (CMS) will be implemented.
  • An AI-driven Chatbot will be integrated to provide instant assistance, answer queries, and guide users effectively.

f. Tutorials and Guides

  • Detailed and interactive tutorials will be developed to support users in navigating DAO proposal processes and crafting submissions for specific grant programs.
  • These resources will include step-by-step instructions, best practices, and sample templates to ensure clarity and ease of use.

These add-ons aim to establish the platform as a highly functional and user-centric information hub, ensuring seamless access to critical resources while driving active participation in DAO programs and initiatives.

7. Purpose Behind Every Design Element

Every design element on the platform has been thoughtfully crafted to serve a distinct purpose, ensuring both functional relevance and strategic alignment with the platform’s objectives.

One notable example is the inclusion of links to Forum, Snapshot, and Tally for every approved program. While some may perceive these as non-essential, their inclusion addresses a fundamental need:

a. Real-Time Proposal System Experience

  • These links allow users to engage with the DAO’s proposal system in real time.
  • By navigating through the stages of proposals—discussion, voting, and implementation—users gain a hands-on understanding of the governance process.

b. Enhanced Learning and Accessibility

  • Beyond providing information, this design element creates an experiential learning opportunity, offering users insight into the mechanics of DAO operations.
  • This is particularly valuable for general users who may lack prior exposure to DAO systems but wish to understand and participate actively.

c. Attracting Larger Organizations and Firms

  • The design aims to demystify the DAO process for larger entities—organizations, studios, and firms—that possess the resources and expertise to undertake significant DAO tasks.
  • By showcasing the proposal process in an accessible and transparent manner, the platform becomes an onboarding tool for new participants who can contribute value to the DAO ecosystem but may be unfamiliar with its mechanisms.

By enabling users to interact with these governance tools directly, the platform fosters transparency, encourages participation, and strengthens the DAO’s overall appeal. This design choice ensures that every user, regardless of their familiarity with decentralized systems, feels equipped to engage and contribute meaningfully.

7. Budget: Comprehensive Breakdown and Key Considerations

To ensure the successful execution of the project over the course of 1 year, we have carefully calculated the budget based on well-defined roles, responsibilities, and working hours. This budget is designed to align with the project’s scope and deliverables, while considering industry standards for hourly rates and efficient utilization of resources. The calculation reflects transparency, fairness, and the value of the expertise required to achieve our goals.

Yearly Project Budget Overview

The total proposed budget for the project is $417,600, ensuring adequate resources for successful execution over a year. This budget provides for skilled professionals across essential roles, with transparent calculations and competitive industry-aligned rates. Below is a comprehensive breakdown of costs:


Detailed Budget Breakdown

Role Hourly Rate ($) Monthly Hours Team Size Total Monthly Cost ($)
Researcher 50 100 1 5,000
Copywriter 40 100 1 4,000
UI/UX Designer 60 120 1 7,200
Developer 60 150 1 9,000
Project Manager/Lead 80 120 1 9600

Total Monthly Cost: $34,800

Total Yearly Cost: $417,600


Key Considerations in Budget Calculation

a. Hours Allocation by Role

Each role’s workload is tailored to their responsibilities:

  • Part-time roles: Researchers, developers, and designers are assigned 4–6 hours per day for focused, specialized deliverables.

  • Full-time roles: Project managers & Developer dedicate 6-8 hours per day to manage planning, coordination, and execution.

b. Competitive Hourly Rates

Hourly rates are based on industry standards and reflect the expertise required:

  • Technical expertise: Developers and project managers ($60/hour and $80/hour) command higher rates due to their critical roles in execution and leadership.

  • Creative roles: Copywriters ($40/hour) and UI/UX designers ($60/hour) are compensated for their contributions to delivering high-quality outputs.

c. Transparent Costing Methodology

The proposed budget ensures:

  • Fair compensation: Rates align with roles’ contributions and responsibilities.

  • No redundant costs: The budget is streamlined to include only essential roles, avoiding unnecessary expenses.

d. Alignment with Project Goals

The budget prioritizes:

  • Efficiency and accountability: Resources are allocated to maximize impact while adhering to timelines.

  • Deliverables-focused planning: Each role is strategically assigned to achieve the project’s objectives without overextension.


The proposed $417,600 annual budget reflects a well-structured, transparent, and competitive allocation of resources, designed to achieve impactful results. With clearly defined roles, competitive rates, and thoughtful planning, this budget ensures that every dollar supports the project’s success.

This approach fosters confidence among stakeholders, demonstrating accountability and a commitment to delivering quality outcomes aligned with community and project objectives.

Conclusion

We extend our gratitude to the community members and delegates who provided valuable feedback on our previous proposal. While the initial proposal was not approved, the platform’s potential impact was widely recognized. This constructive feedback became the foundation for our extensive revisions and improvements.

Key Revisions Based on Feedback

a. Comprehensive Budget Planning

  • In response to concerns about budget transparency, we have developed a detailed and well-structured budget.
  • To ensure accountability, we accounted for realistic working scenarios, such as working days in a year, and have minimized hour commitments for each role to align with essential requirements.
  • Every expense is now fully justified, and the revised budget reflects a significant reduction, demonstrating our commitment to cost-efficiency.

b. Clear KPIs and Measurable Success Metrics

  • Recognizing the need for robust evaluation mechanisms, we have introduced Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), feedback loops, and success indicators.
  • These metrics enable precise monitoring of the platform’s performance, ensuring continuous improvements and measurable outcomes.

c. Collaborative Brainstorming and Refinement

  • Our team conducted in-depth discussions over several months to address all concerns raised.
  • The result is a comprehensive, transparent, and well-thought-out proposal that integrates community insights and aligns with Arbitrum’s vision.

Commitment to Excellence

This proposal reflects our dedication to creating a platform that prioritizes transparency, community engagement, and measurable success. By addressing past challenges and proactively improving key aspects, we are confident that this revised approach will meet the expectations of stakeholders and deliver meaningful value to the Arbitrum ecosystem.

We look forward to your feedback and support in taking this forward.

Thank you

1 Like

Thanks for this proposal. I’ve carefully reviewed the content of this proposal and the demo website https://www.arbitrumhub.io, and I don’t think this so-called one-stop website is superior to what we already have at Arbitrum Foundation. If you’ve thoroughly studied the Arbitrum Foundation website, you’d find that all information about Arbitrum can be found there easily. I don’t like reinventing the wheel—it’s a significant waste of resources. Could you please further explain the necessity of developing ArbitrumHub?

1 Like

Thanks for putting together this proposal! I think having a hub like ArbitrumHub is absolutely essential. Even after a couple of months as a delegate, I still find it challenging to keep up with everything happening in the ecosystem. A platform that consolidates all this information would undoubtedly streamline my work and make community engagement more effective.

I just took some time to scroll through the ArbitrumHub website, and I must say, I’m impressed with what I’ve seen so far. It’s clear a lot of thought has gone into its design and functionality.

However, having not been present for your previous proposal, I read about the budget adjustments you’ve made. While I appreciate the effort to refine it, I still feel that the budget might be on the higher side. Could we explore ways to further optimize costs or perhaps phase the implementation to spread out expenses over time?

That said, I’m very supportive of the initiative and believe it can add significant value to the Arbitrum community.

1 Like

The KPIs mentioned in the proposal are clear, but I have two questions:
1. You’ve committed to publishing 52 newsletters annually, 12 platform audit reports, and one analysis report every two months. This is a high frequency—will it be challenging to execute in practice? If you cannot meet these targets midway, how do you plan to adjust the schedule?
2. Have you considered core metrics like user retention rate or community engagement? These are critical indicators for evaluating the platform’s impact.

Suggestion: Gradual Implementation with Phased Reviews:

Start by dividing the project into several phases. After each phase is completed, assess the actual outcomes before deciding whether to allocate the full budget. Alternatively, you could begin with a community survey. For example, in the first phase, focus on core functionalities and foundational content to ensure that the investment aligns with expected results.

1 Like

The proposal states that ArbitrumHub is an “important first touchpoint” for the Arbitrum ecosystem, but is there a concrete plan to attract more users to engage with the platform long-term? If the platform fails to meet the expected user growth targets, is there a contingency plan to avoid wasting funds?

2 Likes

@0x_Buidler - Would you like to present in the Ongoing Discussion proposals tomorrow? 3rd of December 2024 - Open Discussion of Proposals Governance Call

1 Like

Hi Alex,

Thank you for the invitation. We will be there and would like to have a dedicated agenda for arbitrumhub.

Thanks!

Thanks for putting this all together. ArbitrumHub will definitely be a valuable platform for users and bring real value to the Arbitrum ecosystem.

I don’t have any objections to the changes made to the KPIs and budget, but I have one idea I’d love to share. How about considering adding an academy feature to ArbitrumHub? Something similar to Binance Academy, where users can get educated and stay updated on all topics related to Arbitrum.

I’d love to hear more thoughts on this, but overall, I’ll be voting yes on this proposal for now. :slightly_smiling_face:

1 Like

Thank you @0xDonPepe for taking the time to share your thoughtful feedback and for exploring ArbitrumHub! We’re delighted that you found the platform impressive and see the value it can bring to the community.

Regarding the budget, we truly appreciate your perspective. We’ve made every effort to keep it reasonable with a detailed breakdown of resources. It’s also worth noting that we haven’t factored in any bonuses or retroactive funding for the significant work we’ve contributed over the past year, using our own time and resources to lay the foundation for this platform.

That said, we take your feedback seriously and will work to consider it in the final iteration. Your support for the initiative means a lot, and we’re committed to ensuring this platform serves the Arbitrum community effectively while being mindful of resources.

Thanks!

Thank you @duokongcrypto for reviewing our proposal and platform, and for finding it impactful. We appreciate the time you’ve taken to provide your feedback and suggestions.

Regarding your first point, we understand your concern about the frequency of our publications. We have Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in place to implement and remove strategies that are not working out, which will enable us to adjust our schedule as needed. We’re committed to delivering the promised frequency, but we’re also realistic about what we can handle. We’ll definitely take a closer look at our schedule and see if there are ways to optimize it further in the final proposal.

Regarding your second point, we completely agree that user retention rate and community engagement are critical indicators for evaluating the platform’s impact. In fact, we’ve stressed on these aspects in our proposal and have created a Google Analytics and Looker Studio setup to track user behaviors and visits in real-time. This will allow us to gauge interest and understand how and from where traffic is coming. Additionally, we plan to collaborate with different initiatives and Arbitrum socials to raise awareness about arbitrumhub and onboard more users. By maintaining the proper relevance of arbitrumhub platform, we’ll be able to create a seamless experience for users and encourage community engagement.

We appreciate your suggestion about gradual implementation with phased reviews. This is a solid approach that will enable us to assess actual outcomes and adjust our strategy accordingly. We will definitely consider dividing our tasks and goals into quarterly fashion, and you will see this reflected in the final iteration of our proposal.

Our primary focus is on ensuring the operational efficiency and growth of the platform. Over the past year, we have built and maintained it independently without any compensation. With proper support and resources from the DAO, we are confident that we can significantly enhance its utility and impact.

To address any concerns, the proposed budget will be released to us quarterly through MSS. If the DAO feels that we are not delivering on our promises, and a majority consensus among DAO Delegates agrees, the initiative can be halted, and proportional funds will be returned to the DAO.


Thank you again for your feedback and suggestions - we look forward to incorporating them into our proposal.

1 Like

Thank you so much, @Ignas, for reviewing and sharing your ideas—that’s exactly the kind of collaboration we’re here for!

Regarding your thoughts on the ‘ArbitrumHub Academy,’ we will definitely brainstorm ways to incorporate this into the hub we’ve built. Implementing such an initiative would likely involve partnering with exceptional educators and could bring a valuable influx of builders through our combined audiences.

Thank you again for your support and feedback—it’s truly appreciated!

1 Like

Hi @0x_Buidler , congratulations on your participation in the bi-weekly call. I’ve been exploring the Arbitrum Hub platform and I think it offers a very quick and user-friendly experience. Including a “Newsletter” feature with Mailchimp functionality could help create a more informed email-based community.
I believe that if all the information is going to be centralized on a single webpage, it would be important to incorporate the efforts made by the Arbitrum Foundation on their site.
I really think the budget is quite excessive, unless more users are involved to further strengthen the online efforts. As some have mentioned, involving Arbitrum Academy could be key to growing the number of new people who want to build on Arbitrum and I support the idea.

Thank you, @0xTALVO.ETH_MTY, for taking the time to review our proposal and explore ArbitrumHub. I want to emphasize that ArbitrumHub is developed with extensive research into the entire Arbitrum ecosystem, careful design, rigorous brainstorming, and meticulous execution. This effort required significant resources, time, commitment, and teamwork.

Regarding the budget, we have made every effort to keep it reasonable with a detailed breakdown. However, we will explore further optimization and consider incorporating retroactive funding or bonus elements as alternatives.

We truly appreciate your suggestions and take them very seriously.

Thank you!

The following reflects the views of the Lampros DAO (formerly ‘Lampros Labs DAO’) governance team, composed of Chain_L (@Blueweb), @Euphoria, and Hirangi Pandya (@Nyx), based on our combined research, analysis, and ideation.

Thank you for putting forward this detailed proposal.

This proposal could be a valuable initiative for the Arbitrum DAO. A centralized platform like ArbitrumHub will simplify onboarding for new users by consolidating resources and reducing a lot of scattered information. We’ve reviewed the platform and find it helpful, appreciating the dedication and effort put into its development.

However, we noticed a few areas where clarification might be needed.

The proposal mentions using social media and newsletters to promote the platform, which is a great strategy. However, we noticed that there isn’t a social media manager or digital marketing expert included in the budget breakdown. Could you clarify how these tasks will be managed?

Secondly, the budget seems to be on the higher end. We would like to see some iteration and optimization of expenses as mentioned before the proposal moves to the Tally voting stage.

In the budget, it is mentioned that a UI/UX designer is needed for the entire year, working 120 hours monthly. While a designer might be crucial during the initial build phase, it seems unlikely that such extensive involvement would be needed after the platform is built. For me, I think roles like a researcher and copywriter might be more critical for the platform in the long term. As the DAO evolves, the flow of data and information will likely increase, requiring more focus on gathering and presenting accurate and timely content rather than frequent design updates.

We also agree with what @duokongcrypto suggested about dividing the project into milestones or phases.

This phased approach would not only allow for regular examinations of the work but also ensure that timelines are met and deliverables are aligned with expectations.

Lastly, since the platform will provide real-time updates, how frequently will the data be updated? Will the updates happen on a daily, weekly, or event-based schedule? This could help the community better understand the platform’s responsiveness to changes in the DAO ecosystem.

Overall, we believe this is a good platform for delegates and users, and with some clarifications and refinements, it has the potential to significantly improve the onboarding experience and resource accessibility for the Arbitrum DAO community.

2 Likes

Thanks for your proposal. It is a huge task trying to be the DAOs hub!

I have a question about this section:

I see that in the current website, the person/entity responsible for one specifc program needs to go there and input the information (like forking a GH repo and submitting a PR). Is that the approach you guys are aiming? Or this monthly review is for them to check if the content you guys pulled are correct?

Either way, this is additional work for them. Did you reach out to them to check if this is feasible?

Thanks in advance!

1 Like

Thank you, @jameskbh, for the feedback.

Regarding your concerns, every program has unique requirements, operations, and publicly available information, including timelines. Our approach here involves thorough research for each program, then design and brainstorm a dedicated section with well-structured infographics and content flow, including relevant educational articles.

Monthly review check-in: This involves following up with program managers to ensure that the design, content and infographics we created align with their program objectives, are accurate, and reduce potential miscommunication with the audience.

Feasibility: The review process is 100% feasible, as we’ve successfully tried it with AVI, AF, and others.

Additionally, if a program manager requests the ability to publish blogs independently under their specific hub, we have a system in place to provide them access to a custom CMS tailored to their needs.

To clarify, we do not expect program managers to create a hub, publish-info or anything themselves. Moreover, we ensure that no raw content is published; instead, we follow a refined approach featuring proper visuals, infographics, and clearly digestible objectives.

thanks

1 Like

We came across a version of this same proposal on Questbook, and we’d like to understand better what’s going on.

Why is this being pitched with significantly different timelines and budgets depending on the platform? On Questbook, the proposal is framed as a 2.5-month initiative with a $50,000 budget, whereas here it’s a year-long project requiring $417,600. This contrast raises serious questions about transparency and consistency.

The budget in this version feels a bit inflated or poorly justified. For example:

Hourly Rates and Team Size: The proposed roles and rates—like $80/hour for a project manager or $60/hour for a UI/UX designer—might be industry-standard, but is it reasonable to allocate nearly $10,000 monthly to a single project manager when the timeline spans an entire year? Why not restructure roles to reflect the workload instead of locking in high-cost, full-time salaries?

Efficiency: In the Questbook version, the team demonstrated the ability to deliver meaningful results (like CMS deployment and community engagement systems) within 2.5 months for a fraction of this budget. If the same team can achieve that level of productivity on a smaller budget, what justifies extending this timeline and inflating costs so drastically here?

Deliverables and Impact: The proposal lacks clarity on how this $417,600 will directly translate into measurable outcomes. The KPIs mentioned (e.g., newsletters, audits, social media posts) don’t seem to warrant such a heavy financial commitment.

Scalability: The phased/timeline approach in the Questbook version seems far more responsible. Why isn’t that model being applied here? Testing critical features and their impact first, before scaling up, would ensure resources are allocated effectively and community needs are met without unnecessary financial strain.

Payment Model: Additionally, did you consider implementing a milestone-based payment scheme, similar to the one suggested on Questbook? This could ensure that funds are released based on clear milestones and achieved deliverables, fostering both financial accountability and community trust.

The way the proposal is presented, it could be interpreted more as a long-term funding request rather than a sustainable initiative for the DAO. It might be helpful to consider a more agile, phased approach with a clear breakdown of costs and impact-focused deliverables, so that the proposal aligns better with the community’s expectations.

Before moving forward, we’d strongly recommend aligning this version with the more streamlined approach presented on Questbook, incorporating a milestone-based payment scheme, and offering clearer justifications for the increased timeline and costs. Otherwise, it’s hard to see this as the best use of DAO resources. Or even wait until s3 of Questbook starts.

1 Like

Thank you for your valuable inputs. I would like to address a few points regarding the Questbook proposal. This proposal was designed as a temporary relief measure to help us avoid burnout and secure some immediate funding to sustain our efforts but it didn’t get through due to program closure. Over the past 10+ months, we have been developing ArbitrumHub entirely on a voluntary basis, dedicating a lot of time and considerable effort to bring it to its current state.

While the $50k grant we initially proposed for 2.5 months, through Questbook was not sufficient to meet the long-term requirements of the project, it was intended as a stopgap solution within the grant’s limitations. Our ultimate vision is to make ArbitrumHub an integral part of the DAO, which requires a focus on long-term sustainability, consistent resources, and ongoing proper commitment.

A key challenge we face is that, the DAO typically do not compensate for past unpaid work, which creates a grey area for builders. While grants like Questbook can provide short-term support, they are not a sustainable solution for a long-term initiative like ArbitrumHub, which operates solely for the benefit of the Arbitrum DAO without external revenue streams.

We also appreciate your feedback on optimizing roles, costs, and tracking impact on a quarterly basis. These recommendations will be reflected in the final iteration of the proposal. While the budget request covers a year, it will be managed by the MSS and disbursed quarterly. Should the DAO determine that we are not delivering on our commitments, and a majority of delegates reach consensus, the initiative can be halted, and any proportional unused funds will be returned to the DAO.

Thanks

1 Like

This was basically my first thought.
Why do we need another version of what the Arbitrum foundation is already offering?

Maybe @0x_Buidler can highlight those?
But currently I don’t see the benefit of having both and spending nearly 500k a year for hosting a website.

I could see this being done by some kind of AI agent in the future probably for a quarter of the asked price or even less.

yeah, I’m still waiting for the clarification from @0x_Buidler

1 Like