Thanks for this proposal!
My 2 cents here:
I want to start saying that I like the gist of it, and the visuals are really appealing.
The idea of having a hub, or an information aggregator, sounds interesting, and I support it. What does that mean to me? A place where I can easily go to the primary source of information. That saves time and help the data/information/content to be discoverable.
Having a look at this page, it does just that.
When we go to this page, content from the primary source is replicated. While that can provide more context, it introduces another place where the information needs to be updated. And verified for correctness. I don’t think this part of the proposal generates value enough to justify the added cost of it.
I understand that we need to present information in a more digestible way, but I believe that gap should be filled with research/marketing pieces around the initiatives themselves instead of inflating a place (the hub) where I would like to go to have quick access to the info that I want.