Hello and thanks for the proposal.
Want to start by saying that the following opinion is quite personal.
I think the site is quite good, but would also need a lot of fix, partially on the structure and partially on the info (as highlighted by @jameskbh). But this is also ok because you did ran the whole time without funding.
The main problem i have is that we have the trend, in the dao, to build all sort of infrastructures (website, bot, dapp etc) that are detached one from another.
Even more, we are doing this with no strategic view on top.
I have the strong opinion that the dao should do a more comprehensive plan in this regard: have his own website, his own socials, his own initiative, and also own the infra and the content related to this.
This hasn’t happened so far because we lack a legal entity, and we have had the AF that has been a steward in this sense when it was needed. But, hopefully, will change when we have the OpCo.
All to say that I personally can’t currently support this proposal because I think we need an higher level plan from the dao to craft and create infrastructures and content that make sense based on the goals that we have (and for this the SOS proposal from @Entropy, after the vision proposal we just voted, will be able to help as well).
Don’t get me wrong, we need a front end for the dao, even this forum is hosted on the foundation domain. But we are at the point in which we need to own it, and we are also at the point in which we need to collectively establish what content we want in there, and then hire eventually service providers or elect people to create such content. It has to fall into a more strategic plan.
Beside this, I generally speaking agree with the comments on the budget. Without going into the specific details, 19k per month for all of this feels like a lot.