First, we want to acknowledge the effort invested in maintaining the platform with limited resources. We also appreciate the $15,600 monthly price reduction and the revisions of the proposal to incorporate feedback from the previous iteration.
We support the idea of establishing an ArbitrumHub to aggregate information, and this is the primary reason we will be voting in favor at the snapshot. Our main concern is about how this initiative will integrate with other DAO efforts and its scope to ensure it can truly become the go-to resource for information. As highlighted by other delegates, we believe it would be beneficial for users to have straightforward access to the “source” of the information, rather than duplicating content that is already available on other platforms. Simplifying the layout and removing non-essential information would be a good approach to ensuring success.
We recognize that we are entering the budget discussion late. While we do not take issue with the monthly hours outlined, ideally we would like to see adjustments to the hourly rates for the research and copywriting roles before Tally.
Finally, do you have an estimate for hosting or tool-related costs?
Even if these will be covered by the ArbitrumHub, it would still be helpful to have a clearer understanding of these expenses.