Proposal [Non-Constitutional]: Procurement Framework [Security Service Providers]
The @SEEDLatam delegation has decided to vote FOR this proposal at the Temperature Check.
Rationale
The proposal seeks to establish an RFP for selecting auditors or security service providers in the Arbitrum ecosystem. We believe this is an essential first step to ensure high-quality services for the DAO in a fair and competitive way.
This will not only contribute to improving the current and future security of the projects and the ecosystem in general but will also encourage the participation of the parties that are truly interested and create healthy competition between security service providers.
Conclusion
The objective of this Snapshot vote was to keep following the right path of the previous proposal where the Arbitrum DAO voted in favor of Consolidate the Arbitrum Security into an RFP Process
AIP: ArbOS Version 11
The @SEEDLatam delegation has decided to vote FOR this proposal at the Temperature Check.
Rationale
We believe that updating all Arbitrum chains with the EVM Shanghai update, along with the PUSH0 opcode, is a wise decision to bring Arbitrum closer to the technological infrastructure of Ethereum. This ensures that new developers using Ethereum will feel comfortable working in Arbitrum.
The Shanghai update later or soon will have an indirect impact not only on Arbitrum but all L2 solutions that use Ethereum as L1. So, we believe that it is crucial to consider all technical changes that Ethereum undergoes to guarantee that Arbitrum will remain at the forefront of technological advancements.
Conclusion
We support the idea of keeping Arbitrum updated with all the changes that Ethereum will undergo to improve its performance. This action will indirectly enhance the L2 chains that Arbitrum DAO handles.
[TALLY]Empowering Early Contributors: The community Arbiter Proposal
The @SEEDLatam delegation has decided to vote AGAINST this proposal at the Temperature Check.
Rationale
Upon reviewing the information provided after the snapshot vote, we concluded that it’s simply too difficult to determine if the contributors are being compensated justly for their contributions to the DAO. We’re not trying to minimize their effort or make it sound like they don’t deserve any compensation, but we think it would be reasonable to make this compensation proportional to their contributions or at least have a clearer idea of what these contributions were, which would be expected for the amount being requested.
Most of the information provided is challenging to validate completely. We believe that it can be presented more clearly to assist all delegates in supporting this proposal.
Conclusion
The support of all users to help grow the Arbitrum ecosystem is crucial for attracting new potential users. However, we believe that this kind of contribution requires a deeper explanation of the budget to maintain transparency.