GozmanGonzalez Delegate Communication Thread

Governance Delegate Statements
1

Name: GozmanGonzalez

Delegate Address: 0x79f16606e9a64eDb8bA09c55eE1375bDa883c032

Forum Handle: @GozmanGonzalez

Twitter: GozmanGonzalez

Telegram: @GozmanGonzalez

Discord: @gozmangonzalez

Hey Arbitrum DAO!

I’m GozmanGonzalez, a Web3 communicator at heart, an active contributor across various on-chain governance ecosystems. With a legal background and real-world experience in community operations, I specialize in translating complex protocols into clear, actionable insights for everyday users.

Over the past few years, I’ve helped grow communities from 0 to 1, led impactful conversations on X (Twitter), and onboarded newcomers into the world of decentralized governance. Now, I’m excited to bring that same drive and clarity to Arbitrum, a network I see as critical to Ethereum’s scalability and decentralization.

I’m here to listen, advocate, and help shape a community-first future, one that’s inclusive, informed, and aligned with the values that make Arbitrum thrive.

Let’s build it together.

Why I’m Running as a Delegate for Arbitrum DAO

I’m running as a delegate to help shape an Arbitrum DAO that empowers builders, safeguards decentralization, and fosters meaningful community participation.

Arbitrum sits at the heart of Ethereum’s Layer 2 scaling efforts, and its future depends on governance that is not only efficient but deeply intentional. I believe this DAO should be stewarded by voices that prioritize clarity, transparency, and alignment with long-term community values and I bring those principles with me.

As an active contributor across multiple Web3 communities, I’ve witnessed how effective governance can fuel innovation and strengthen trust. My goal is to be a voice for both builders and everyday contributors, advocating for transparent incentive systems, responsible experimentation, and governance that works forthe ecosystem, not just within it.

I’m not here to vote passively. I’m here to listen, engage, and co-create a governance structure that reflects Arbitrum’s open, community-driven spirit.

Let’s shape Arbitrum’s future together.

2

Reallocate Redeemed USDM Funds to STEP 2 Budget (Snapshot)

Vote: FOR

I support this proposal as it efficiently restores yield to previously productive DAO capital. The $3.5M in USDC was only redeemed due to the Mountain Protocol shutdown not due to any strategic change.

With STEP 2 already approved, reallocating these idle funds to the same money-market managers (Spiko, WisdomTree, Franklin Templeton) aligns with the original intent, adds no new risk, and revives ~4.5% yield. At current rates, that’s ~$13K/month in lost opportunity.

This is a straightforward, low-effort way to maximize capital efficiency.

3

Vote: For — Strengthening OpCo’s Operational Backbone

Gauntlet supports enhancing OpCo Foundation’s capabilities. OpCo is a vital pillar in the Arbitrum ecosystem and must remain agile. We’re in favor of phasing out outdated programs and empowering OpCo to lead the reorg with the tools it needs to deliver.

4

Proposal: Arbitrum Treasury Management Council – Consolidating Efforts
Vote: For

Rationale:
I voted For because this proposal streamlines treasury oversight by replacing fragmented structures with a unified council. It reduces inefficiencies, improves coordination, and keeps the DAO in control, without adding extra cost.

While centralization concerns exist, ongoing transparency and accountability will be key.

Overall, it’s a smart, scalable upgrade for Arbitrum’s treasury management.

Proposal: [Constitutional] AIP: Remove Cost Cap on Arbitrum Nova
Vote: For

Rationale:
Removing Nova’s cost cap is a logical next step. With EIP-4844 and Orbit adoption shifting demand, this proposal ends an outdated subsidy and realigns Nova’s fees with its true role in the ecosystem. Teams seeking ultra-low costs now have better options via Orbit, making continued treasury spend here inefficient. We support this shift—as long as clear communication and smooth transitions are prioritized for affected teams.

5

Arbitrum Research and Development Collective V2 - Extension

Vote: For

Rationale:

The first 6 months have shown strong coordination, operational transparency, and clear cost-efficiency (shoutout to Entropy for waiving comp & Juanrah for stepping up solo).

Continuity is key, why hit pause on progress?

Research, Security, and Risk are too critical to risk a reset. Let’s double down on what’s working and keep building momentum through the full 12-month cycle as originally planned.

This isn’t about reinventing the wheel, it’s about letting it roll further.

Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working with the DAO, Year 2 and Year 3

Vote:For

I’m voting YES because Entropy Advisors has consistently added real value to Arbitrum governance. From improving treasury transparency to supporting initiatives like DRIP and STEP, they’ve proven they can execute and contribute strategically. Their dashboards have also helped improve data access and reporting. While the budget is sizable, I see it as an investment in a capable, aligned team that’s already delivering results. Let’s build on that momentum.

6

[Constitutional] AIP: Disable Legacy Tether Bridge

Vote: For

Rationale:

From a legal and operational risk standpoint, keeping the legacy USDT bridge live introduces unnecessary liability and exposure. The current configuration not only delays user access but risks non-compliant handling of smart contract deposits, especially where refund mechanisms are absent. Disabling the bridge streamlines compliance, protects user funds, and aligns with industry best practices in consumer asset safety and protocol governance. It’s a preventive legal upgrade as much as a technical one. Fully support this move.

Proposal: Consolidate Idle USDC to the ATMC’s Stablecoin Balance (Snapshot)

Vote: For

I believe there is no reason for these funds to just sit there doing nothing when they could be earning yield. The Events Budget still works exactly the same for the rest of 2025, the only change is we’re being smarter about where the money sits.

Same with the leftover ARDC and ADPC funds, it’s better to keep things moving instead of stalling or waiting on another full proposal just to put those funds to use.

Feels like a solid, common-sense move to make the DAO’s treasury work harder for us.