StableLab Delegate Thread

Proposal (Snapshot): Approve the Nova Fee Sweep Action

Vote : For

Rationale : We support this proposal as it allows to move 1885 Eth (which were previously effectively locked due to complicated procedure) into DAO Treasury.

Proposal (Snapshot): Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget

Vote: For

Rationale: Stylus can potentially be one of the major drivers behind Arbitrum’s growth. We are confident that additional projects for participation were selected with care and great deal of diligence. Given the strong demand by a wide range of well qualified candidates it only makes sense to extend the program to fully realize its potential.

Proposal (Snapshot): Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0

Vote: For

Rationale: We support this proposal, diversification is bread and butter of financial stability.

Proposal (Snapshot): [CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 40 Callisto

Vote: For

Rationale: We support this proposal, it’s important for long term Arbitrum development to keep innovation aligned with Ethereum.

Proposal (Snapshot): Arbitrum Audit Program

Proposal (Snapshot): [CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 40 Callisto

Vote: For

Rationale: We support this proposal, it’s important for long term Arbitrum development to keep innovation aligned with Ethereum.

Proposal (Snapshot): Arbitrum Audit Program

Vote: For

Rationale: We are in favor of this proposal, supporting new projects on Arbitrum by any means necessary, including sponsorship of audit sends a very strong positive signal to community of developers.

Proposal (Tally): Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget

Vote: For

Rationale: Following our vote FOR during snapshot, we also support this proposal on Tally.

Proposal (Tally): Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3

Vote: For

Proposal (Tally): OpCo: A DAO-adjacent Entity for Strategy Execution

Vote: For

Rationale: Following our vote FOR during snapshot, we also support this proposal on Tally.

Proposal (Tally): Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0

Vote: For

Rationale: Following our vote FOR during snapshot, we also support this proposal on Tally.

Proposal: The Watchdog: Arbitrum DAO’s Grant Misuse Bounty Program

Vote: For

Rationale: Establishing The Watchdog program strengthens the DAO’s integrity by creating incentives for the community to surface fund misappropriation, which has historically gone unchecked. This initiative fosters accountability, helps deter malicious behavior, and ultimately protects DAO capital.

Proposal: Arbitrum D.A.O. Season 3 Elections - Gaming

Vote: 100% for Floock

Rationale: We gave 100% of our voting weight to Flook in the Gaming domain because their track record demonstrates an ability to identify high-potential projects and allocate grants in a way that maximizes impact.

Proposal: Arbitrum D.A.O. Season 3 Elections - Dev Tooling on One and Stylus

Vote: 100% for Juandi

Rationale: We gave 100% of our voting weight to Juandi due to their strong technical background, clear alignment with the DAO’s priorities, and hands-on experience with Arbitrum’s developer ecosystem.

Proposal: Arbitrum D.A.O. Season 3 Elections - Education, Community Growth, and Events

Vote: 100% for SEEDGov

Rationale: We allocated 100% of our voting power to SEEDGov based on their consistent contributions to governance education, community onboarding, and their thoughtful approach to ecosystem engagement.

Proposal: Arbitrum D.A.O. Season 3 Elections - New Protocols and Ideas

Vote: 50% for Saurabh 50% for CastleCapital

Rationale: We split our vote evenly between Saurabh and CastleCapital as both candidates brought strong, complementary qualifications to the table.

Proposal: [Constitutional AIP] Activate Arbitrum BoLD + Infura Nova Validator Whitelist

Vote: For

Rationale: Enabling BoLD is a major milestone toward decentralizing Arbitrum One through permissionless validation, while maintaining strong security guarantees.

Proposal: Arbitrum Growth Circles Event Proposal

Vote: For

Rationale: We support this proposal because with an experienced team and clear KPIs, this initiative directly aligns with the DAO’s goals of ecosystem development and community-led growth.

Proposal: Arbitrum D.A.O. (Domain Allocator Offerings) Grant Program - Season 3

Vote: For

Rationale: StableLab Supports the QB grants program in Arbitrum. The first 2 seasons have proven to be successful and we are excited to see what they fund in season 3.

Proposal: TMC recommendation

Vote: #1 Deploy Both Strategies Abstain #4 Deploy Nothing #2 Only Deploy ARB Strategy #3 Only Deploy Stable Strategy

Rationale: We support this proposal and prioritize deploying both the Stablecoin and ARB strategies (#1). While we appreciate the TMC’s cautious approach, we believe deploying a portion of the DAO’s ARB holdings into on-chain strategies complements the stablecoin allocation and helps reduce idle asset exposure.

Proposal: GMC’s Preferred Allocations (7,500 ETH)

Vote: For deploy capital

Rationale: We support this proposal as it strikes a strong balance between conservative yield generation and ecosystem growth by deploying 7,500 ETH across trusted protocols like Lido, Aave, Fluid, and Camelot.

Proposal: [CONSTITUTIONAL] Proposal: For Arbitrum DAO to register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router

Vote: For

Rationale: We support this proposal because it improves the user experience and functionality of the Arbitrum Bridge. This ensures users can seamlessly bridge stablecoins via the official UI. The contracts are already deployed, audited, and live, making this a low-risk, high-impact integration for the Arbitrum ecosystem.

Proposal: [CONSTITUTIONAL] - Adopt Timeboost + Nova Fee Sweep

Vote: For

Rationale: The Nove Fee Sweep Action efficiently consolidates 1,885 ETH in historical Nova fees into the Arbitrum DAO Treasury using modern, automated infrastructure. This action improves treasury transparency, reduces governance friction, and completes the transition to the upgraded fee routing system, strengthening the DAO’s financial operations with minimal risk.

Proposal: [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp

Vote: Against

Rationale: We voted against this proposal due to concerns around cost-efficiency, unclear long-term impact, and limited evidence of effectiveness from the initial pilot.

Proposal: [NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Audit Program

Vote: For

Rationale: This initiative not only enhances on-chain security and reduces risk across the Arbitrum ecosystem, but it also promotes responsible scaling, supports developer adoption, and encourages innovation on Arbitrum chains.

Proposal: [Non-constitutional] ARB Incentives: User Acquisition for dApps & Protocols

Vote: For

Rationale: This program builds on past learnings from STIP and LTIPP and aims to go beyond onchain incentives by targeting users at top of funnel level. Focus on iteration, reporting and analysis are a plus to gather valuable feedback for the DAO.

Proposal: TMC ARB Recommendation

Vote: For

Rationale: The suggested ARB strategies are too high on the risk/rewards spectrum and not worth pursuing.

Proposal: TMC Stablecoin Recommendation

Vote: For

Rationale: The expected yield from the stablecoin strategies is very attractive given current market conditions, while diversifying the Treasury by selling ARB into stables guarantees yield generation and operational versatility.

Proposal: OpCo – Oversight and Transparency Committee (OAT) Elections

Vote: For

Rationale: We think these four candidates are a strong addition to the AOT for the following reasons:

Jana: She has worked in the interface between Rari Foundation, Rari DAO and Rarible, guiding all of them and ensuring alignment. She is also familiar with the Arbitrum ecosystem and her contributions are remarkable.

Frisson: An active and respected contributor for Arbitrum. Initiated great governance initiatives for Arbitrum, keeping it at the industry’s forefront.

Marc Zeller: He is an active contributor in many DAOs in the space and with ACI has helped AAVE grow while becoming a lean and accountable organization.

Joseph: With a more technical background, he has a different profile, complementary to the rest of the candidates and his vision on Arbitrum development can bring a positive guidance to OpCo.

Proposal: Security Council election

Vote: OpenZeppelin - 100%

Rationale: We support OpenZeppelin with all our VP to support their inclusion into the Council. OZ has a strong technical team, developed the governor contract and are respected among the community.

Proposal: The Watchdog: Arbitrum DAO’s Grant Misuse Bounty Program

Vote: For

Rationale: An incentive to disclose misbehavior in DAO funded programs that currently lack oversight is a great idea, it has little downside and a lot of potential for recovering misused funds and enforcing accountability for the DAO.

Proposal: [CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 40 Callisto

Vote: For

Rationale: This upgrade will mark a cornerstone for the future of Arbitrum. Specially remarkable is the inclusion of support for account abstraction, which will enable the next level upgrade for UX in crypto.

Proposal: Approval of STEP 2 Committee’s Preferred Allocations

Vote: For

Rationale: We are happy following the STEP 2 Commitee’s recommendations and will continue evaluating the performance of the funds once deployed for future assessment.

Proposal: [Non-consitutional]: Top-up for Hackathon Continuation Program

Vote: Yes to both

Rationale: This is a good one-time solution due to market volatility. We should honor the projects that participated in the program. In the future, we should prioritize the timely selling of Arb over Arb price speculation to meet the funding requirements when they are denominated in dollars.

Proposal: DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP)

Vote: For

Rationale: We appreciate the systematic approach to isolate single DeFi actions in order to better analyze the impact of incentives. Additionally, being protocol agnostic makes a credibly neutral chain, which we think is also positive.

Proposal: [Constitutional] AIP: Constitutional Quorum Threshold Reduction

Vote: For

Rationale: While reducing quorum thresholds may temporarily ease operational challenges, we believe it increases long-term governance risks without addressing underlying participation issues. This proposal currently lacks data-driven justification and a clear framework for future adjustments. We recommend pairing quorum reductions with complementary strategies, such as delegating Treasury-held ARB to vetted delegates and activating stARB governance staking, to sustainably boost participation and ensure DAO resilience.4.5

Proposal: Wind Down the MSS + Transfer Payment Responsibilities to the Arbitrum Foundation

Vote: For

Rationale: The MSS has played an important role in operationalizing DAO decisions and executing payments reliably. However, with the OpCo set to become the main execution and oversight body for Arbitrum governance, we agree that the MSS has reached a natural endpoint in its lifecycle. Transitioning MSS responsibilities to the Arbitrum Foundation as an interim measure, until the OpCo is fully operational, is a practical and efficient solution that avoids the overhead of reauthorizing a short-lived budget extension.

Proposal: Adjust the Voting Power of the Arbitrum Community Pool & Ratify the Agentic Governance Pivot

Vote: B - Reduce delegation to 100k

Rationale: Event Horizon’s shift toward agentic governance marks a significant change in scope that warrants transparent acknowledgment and reassessment of delegated voting power. While we recognize the value of experimentation in DAO governance, continuing to support such a pivot at the original scale of 7M ARB, without formal ratification or system audits, poses governance risks.

Option B provides a balanced path forward: it affirms the DAO’s commitment to innovation while limiting undue influence from an experimental framework still undergoing community evaluation. Reducing the delegation to 100,000 ARB allows continued testing with proportional responsibility, pending further clarity via the upcoming AGI proposal.

Proposal: Reallocate Redeemed USDM Funds to STEP 2 Budget

Vote: For

Rationale: We trust the STEP 2 Committee in its decision to reallocate the reddemed USDM funds.

Proposal: Updating the OpCo Foundation’s Operational Capability

Vote: For

Rationale:

Cross-posting here:

Proposal: Let’s improve our governance forum with three proposals.app feature integrations

Vote: Abstain

Rationale:

Cross-posting here:

Proposal: DeFi Renaissance Incentive Program (DRIP)

Vote: For

Rationale: We appreciate the systematic approach to isolate single DeFi actions in order to better analyze the impact of incentives. Additionally, being protocol agnostic makes a credibly neutral chain, which we think is also positive.

Proposal: [CANCELED] CONSTITUTIONAL Register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router

Vote: Against

Rationale: This Proposal contained and error in the msg.value parameter, more information here.