Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties

[PrincetonBlockchain]

The Princeton Blockchain Club is voting FOR streamlining the LTIPP bounty process.

Pretty reasonable to let the LTIPP council handle this quickly instead of requiring a bunch of DAO-wide votes. Seconding extending the application deadline as well.

[olimpio]

Voting for. On board for any process optimization that will help the DAO make better decisions, and no additional cost.

[SavvyDAO]

Savvy DAO voted FOR this proposal.

See delegate thread here:

Savvy DAO - Delegate Communication Thread

Savvy DAO voted FOR the “Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties” proposal REASONING: to enhance efficiency and accountability in the bounty selection process. Allowing the LTIPP council more autonomy ensures a quicker and more informed decision-making process, reducing the burden of numerous DAO-wide votes. This streamlined approach encourages more qualified researchers to apply without the need for extensive lobbying. Additionally, the council’s expertise and focused oversight will lead to better ou…

[jameskbh]

For tracking purposes, I’m copying the reasoning given on my snapshot vote:

Reason: Giving this mandate to the council is a good move, as they are more familiar with the program than the DAO itself.

[AbdullahUmar]

Below are the opinions of the UADP:

Arbitrum delegates are no stranger to facing a cumbersome amount of votes–sometimes unnecessarily. For the sake of efficiency, we believe that this proposal will make the LTIPP bounty process more systematic and mitigate issues surrounding bias/popularity contest. The council was elected into their current position due its members’ expertise, and we trust that they’ll keep the DAO’s best interest at heart. To those ends, we voted For this proposal.