Pilot for a Questbook Jumpstart fund for problem definition and DAO improvement
Vote: In favor, excluding the playbook.
Rationale: Don’t see the value in the playbook as of now. I really like the overall concept and for the small cost, I think its worth experimenting. Daniel has been in the DAO for a while and believe he will execute this to a level of high quality.
Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO
Vote: Yes
rationale: Now that there is more clarity in the proposal, I am happy to support it, and I am excited to see these talented individuals help steer Arb dao in the right direction.
Gaming Catalyst Program (GCP) Council Voting
Vote: IL, coinflip, Devansh, Greg and Karthik
rationale: Voted based on experiences with most of them, Not familiar with others and hard to vote in this format.
ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance
Vote: For
Rationale: Aligns the DAO and contributors a lot more closely without sacrificing much. This is a step forward to encoruaging sustainable contributions
Transparency and Standardized Metrics for Orbit Chains
Vote: For
Rationale: Orbit chains will be a key aspect for arb’s growth, it’s essential to have clear transparency into how they are functioning so the DAO can understand how they can best support orbit chains.
ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard
Vote: For
Rationale: Strong team in governance, happy to support this initiative.
[Constitutional] ArbOS 31 “Bianca” (Stylus, RIP-7212 Support, Nova Fee Router)
Vote: For
Rationale: Same as prev snapshot rationale.
Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)
Vote: For
Rationale:vSame as prev snapshot rationale.
Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO
Should the DAO Default to using Shielded Voting for Snapshot Votes?
Vote: For elections only Rationale: Bit ironic to post this now since its shutter but posting due to heading offline for a time period. I think shutter is well suited for elections for now since it helps reduce the bandwagon effect but its helpful to see votes for other proposals.
Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System.
Vote: For
Rationale: The delegate incentive system has been working as designed and Im in favour of the temporary extension. I would prefer a longer extension though.
ArbitrumDAO Off-site
Vote: For
Rationale: Would be helpful to have something small before devcon to talk about important topics.
An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO
Vote: For
Rationale: This proposal has been in the works for a while and the “proposal” category isnt an issue imo. This is a free and helps the space in general.
In a temp check state, I am in support of this proposal. It’s way overdue that we start looking after the treasury and KPK is one of the best teams in the space to handle this.
Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship
Vote: Abstain
Rationale: Don’t really see the value add and it seems quite last minute for a sponsorship. I haven’t had time to fully read the proposal hence an abstain vote.