Bobbay Delegate Communication Thread

Pilot for a Questbook Jumpstart fund for problem definition and DAO improvement

Vote: In favor, excluding the playbook.
Rationale: Don’t see the value in the playbook as of now. I really like the overall concept and for the small cost, I think its worth experimenting. Daniel has been in the DAO for a while and believe he will execute this to a level of high quality.

1 Like

Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO

Vote: Yes

rationale: Now that there is more clarity in the proposal, I am happy to support it, and I am excited to see these talented individuals help steer Arb dao in the right direction.

Gaming Catalyst Program (GCP) Council Voting

Vote: IL, coinflip, Devansh, Greg and Karthik
rationale: Voted based on experiences with most of them, Not familiar with others and hard to vote in this format.

Furucombo’s Misuse of Funds

Vote: Ban
rationale: They had time to respond and did not, they clearly violated the program rules.

Change Arbitrum Expansion Program to allow deployments of new Orbit chains on any blockchain

Vote: For
Rationale: More revenue and EVM alignment across the space is better.

[Non-constitutional] Incentives Detox Proposal

Vote: For
rationale: A period of reflection is importantnt so we can evaluate the successes and failures of the program before moving forward

ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance

Vote: For

Rationale: Aligns the DAO and contributors a lot more closely without sacrificing much. This is a step forward to encoruaging sustainable contributions

Transparency and Standardized Metrics for Orbit Chains

Vote: For

Rationale: Orbit chains will be a key aspect for arb’s growth, it’s essential to have clear transparency into how they are functioning so the DAO can understand how they can best support orbit chains.

ArbitrumDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard

Vote: For

Rationale: Strong team in governance, happy to support this initiative.

[Constitutional] ArbOS 31 “Bianca” (Stylus, RIP-7212 Support, Nova Fee Router)

Vote: For

Rationale: Same as prev snapshot rationale.

Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)

Vote: For

Rationale:vSame as prev snapshot rationale.

Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working With Arbitrum DAO

Vote: For

Rationale: Same as prev snapshot rationale.

Should the DAO Default to using Shielded Voting for Snapshot Votes?

Vote: For elections only
Rationale: Bit ironic to post this now since its shutter but posting due to heading offline for a time period. I think shutter is well suited for elections for now since it helps reduce the bandwagon effect but its helpful to see votes for other proposals.

Proposal to Temporary Extend Delegate Incentive System.

Vote: For

Rationale: The delegate incentive system has been working as designed and Im in favour of the temporary extension. I would prefer a longer extension though.

ArbitrumDAO Off-site

Vote: For

Rationale: Would be helpful to have something small before devcon to talk about important topics.

An (EIP-4824 powered) daoURI for the Arbitrum DAO

Vote: For

Rationale: This proposal has been in the works for a while and the “proposal” category isnt an issue imo. This is a free and helps the space in general.

Should the DAO Create COI & Self Voting Policies?

Vote: For Disclosure and reponsible voting

Rationale: Seems self explanatory to me.

Strategic Treasury Management on Arbitrum

Vote: For

Rationale:

In a temp check state, I am in support of this proposal. It’s way overdue that we start looking after the treasury and KPK is one of the best teams in the space to handle this.

Ethereum Protocol Attackathon Sponsorship

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: Don’t really see the value add and it seems quite last minute for a sponsorship. I haven’t had time to fully read the proposal hence an abstain vote.

[Constitutional] Extend Delay on L2Time Lock

Vote: For

Rationale: Bring on the yellow slice. Happy to support this, makes it more secure.

STIP-Bridge Operational Budget

Vote: For

Rationale: These members are underpaid and overworked. They deserve this compensation!

[Replace Oversight Committee with MSS] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon

Vote: For

Rationale: This makes good use of the MSS.

Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon

Vote: For

Rationale: Interesting way tod diversify voting. Looking forward to see it play out.

Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator

Vote:For

Rationale: Although costs are high, its a step forward for arbitrum. Looking forward to seeing a more trustless solution in the future

ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance

Vote:For

Rationale: This is a great way to align the DAO and voters. Tally and Karma are great SPs here and looking forward to seeing this come live.