Bob-Rossi Delegate Communication Thread

This is my delegate communication thread, I will continue to update overtime.

April Voting Communications

Snapshot:

Tally:

May Voting Communications

Snapshot:

Tally:

To save space on the forums, I’ve posted all my rationale for the STIPP Bridge challenge votes here:

  • MUX: Against, already received a large amount of ARB in the 1st round and per metrics it looks like incentives did not create sustainable, long-term activity
  • Stargate: For, I acknowledge the importance of bridging to reduce fragmentation of L2 networks. Along with not getting their chance with the first STIP due to a technicality.
  • Solv: For, metrics look to indicate growth was achieved with the STIP. Given the amount asked, willing to vote to continue funding
  • Sanko Games: For, novel project and metrics indicate STIP provided value.
  • Tide: Against, I don’t really think I’m seeing the value here in terms of engagement produced per ARB paid. Data doesn’t make it clear to me either
  • KyberSwap: Against, unfortunate situation but due to the hack and lack of KPIs I have to vote against
  • Gains: Against, already recieved a large amoutn of ARB in the 1st round and the metrics seem to indicate any gains during the STIPP period returned to pre-STIPP levels. Not creating sustainable, long-term activity.
  • Boost: Against, it seems sybil concerns are being addressed which is apprecitated, however metrics don’t seem to indicate sustainable, long term activity.
  • Thalse: For, mertrics seem to indicate growth past the STIPP timeframe’
  • Savvy: For, OBL not available at time of voting, but TVL statistics seem to indicate no dropoff past the STIPP timeframe.
  • Stake DAO: Against, ARB still available for incentives, do not believe they need additional funding. Not many unique users given the cost to the DAO.
  • Furucombo: Against, agree with concerns brought up by Cattin (wash trading)
  • Socket Bridge: Against, agree with concerns brought up by Cattin (lack of reporting and funds still available from original STIPP)
  • Angle: Against, not enough growth in metrics to justify the costs
  • OpenOcean: Against, doesn’t seem much activity sustained post STIPP period
  • Thetanuts Finance: For, metrics seem to indicate growth past the STIPP period and see value in funding an additional round.
  • Dolomite & Unami: For, I don’t really see issue with the incentivization method and it seems to have worked well.

June Voting Communications

Snapshot:

Tally

2 Likes

July Voting Communications

Snapshot:

Tally:

Snapshot:

Tally:

September 2024

Snapshot:

Tally

October 2024

Snapshot:

Tally