Of all the other candidates, he’s the most experienced, with a ton of time in gaming as a VC.
The only thing that’s concerning is that he doesn’t participate in the general vote, like the other candidates. It feels like there’s a risk he won’t make it into the top 5, or why was this decision made? I don’t think this should be done in the future - it’s a violation of competition.
This John Kennedy is also quite a good specialist; he worked on game development and network gaming infrastructure at Amazon AWS GameTech.
There’s a similar complaint about him not participating in the general voting process, like other candidates. It feels like there’s a risk he won’t make it into the top 5, or why was this decision made? I don’t think this should be done in the future - it’s a violation of competition.
It’s quite a difficult choice, given that it’s quite difficult to assess the quality of work of each member who has participated for the past 1.5 years.
Greg Canessa is a clear contender for the win - one of the most experienced specialists. David Bolger - I chose him because he’s on the Arbitrum team and can facilitate interactions.
I chose Tekrox.eth because of his active participation on the forum - we talked about the game’s presentation, and his optimism for this area of Arbitrum’s development is evident.
Vote: Greg Canessa, David Bolger, Tekrox.eth (equal shares)
Platform: Snapshot