Cp0x Delegate Communication Thread

Updating the Code of Conduct & DAO’s Procedures


Formally, the code is not in effect now, so it is necessary to formalize it as soon as possible, correcting errors

The code has been revised in some areas, the main ones are:

  • now there is a procedure for replacing committee members who are ending their term early
  • now you can vote for yourself (but you still need to talk about a conflict of interest)

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

[Constitutional] AIP: Disable Legacy Tether Bridge


Due to the fact that Tether has switched to its USDT0, they want to close the official bridge from Arbitrum
In principle, nothing prevents it from being left, but it is possible that there may ultimately be a problem with liquidity, so it is better to remove it.


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Consolidate Idle USDC to the ATMC’s Stablecoin Balance


I have already written about this on social networks - this is the transfer of all excess funds from other programs, where USDC remained, to the new ATMC committee, responsible for treasuries

Although I do not like that ATMC will essentially be managed by Entropy, the idea itself is good - USDC needs to bring profit


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

[Non-Constitutional] - Updates to the DIP, The Complete 1.7 Version


I wrote a fairly long and very detailed post outlining, point by point, how all the proposed changes will only lead to further centralization of power and rewards going exclusively to large delegates, which will reduce engagement and discussion on the forum.
I believe the original goals of the program are fundamentally opposed to these new changes


Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

[CONSTITUTIONAL] Register $BORING in the Arbitrum generic-custom gateway


In essence, this is a formal confirmation of what has already been adopted by 91%, with the remaining ~9% abstaining


Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally

Entropy Advisors: Exclusively Working with the Arbitrum DAO, Y2-Y3


I have always adhered to a fair assessment of the actions of each participant of the Arbitrum community and I value every contribution, even small ones.
But I will never remain silent if too large sums are given away left and right, as in this case - millions of dollars are spent on something that worked practically for free (albeit not so effectively).
I believe that these funds are actually taken from all token holders, i.e.


Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Tally

[CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 50 Dia


Main changes:

  • preparation for Fusaka on Ethereum
  • the ability to pay gas in Orbit chains with any token

There are a few changes compared to mainnet, but they are minor and don’t really affect how the chain works.
The update will happen after the mainnet upgrade


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

[CONSTITUTIONAL] Remove Cost Cap, Update Executors, Disable Legacy USDT Bridge


On-chain confirmation of three votes after Snapshot:

Arbitrum finally did a new audit for the last item, which was the reason I previously voted against the contract update — now that issue is resolved


Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally

[CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: ArbOS Version 50 Dia


Main changes:

  • preparation for Fusaka on Ethereum
  • possibility to pay for gas in Orbit chains with any token

The launch will be after the update on the mainnet

The team answered my questions on technical issues, however, not all the answers satisfied me in terms of decision-making, but at the moment they do not affect the chain’s operation in any way


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Revert the Delegate Incentive Program (DIP) to Version 1.5



Vote:
1 Revert the DIP to v1.5
2 Keep the current version
3 Abstain
4 Sunset the DIP

Platform: Snapshot

[CONSTITUTIONAL] AIP: Security Council Election Process Improvements



Vote:

  • Increase cohort duration
  • Reduce qualification threshold
  • Allow members to bypass Nominee
  • Allow members to rotate keys

Platform: Snapshot

Security Council - Nominee Selection



Vote: 100% - Consensys Diligence
Platform: Tally

[Constitutional] AIP: DVP Quorum



Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Transfer 8,500 ETH from the Treasury to ATMC’s ETH Treasury Strategies



Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

AGV Council Compensation Calibration: Benchmark for Future Council Terms



Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

[Temperature Check] Should we try a Delegate Incentive Program like the Arbitrum Triple Dip?


Overall, I see this option as an interesting alternative to the current version of the DIP.

One of the key advantages of this option is the complete lack of bias on the part of the program manager - PM simply doesn’t influence anything, and rightly so - PM simply organizes all the procedures and process payments.

Bringing the delegate incentive program into a competitive environment is an important step toward improving the program - without it, any program will simply be a proxy for the will of the Arbitrum Foundation.


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Transfer 8,500 ETH from the Treasury to ATMC’s ETH Treasury Strategies


The same explanation as at Snapshot


Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Tally

The DAO Incentive Program (DIP 2.0)



Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

AGV Council Compensation Calibration: Startup-Phase Bonus for Current Council Members



Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

AIP: Raise the gas target, min L2 base fee, & implement improvements to the pricing algorithm


The minimum fee for L2 calculations is being increased from 0.01 to 0.02 gwei.

At the same time, the threshold for automatic gas price increases is being increased (it increases during peak loads).

This will not significantly increase transaction costs during normal times, but will prevent sharp price spikes during peak loads - an excellent solution for both Arbitrage and users.
Offchain Labs also has a two-year mandate to adjust these parameters.


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot