Cp0x Delegate Communication Thread

Subsidy Fund for Security Services


cp0x believes that supporting projects in terms of audits is a good initiative.
However, we doubted the amount, so it’s good that the author of proposal wrote options with different terms and amounts


Vote: FOR, 2 cohorts of 8 weeks, $5M fund
Platform: Snapshot

Safeguarding Software Developers’ Rights & the Right to Privacy


cp0x fully support this proposal, because in code we trust.


Vote: FOR, Fund with 1,500,000 ARB each
Platform: Snapshot

Double-Down on STIP Successes (STIP-Bridge)


We consider the decision to make double payments without taking into account the results to be incorrect
I understand that most projects are impressed by this proposal, since it has the maximum impact on their projects, but we have procedures for a reason and we need to pre-evaluate the results of each project.


Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Tally

GovHack at ETH CC (Brussels)


We will provide unconditional support to this initiative for the development of Arbitrum


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Grant Request - Curve Finance


cp0x fully supports this project due to its liquidation innovation in lending


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Proposal for Approval of DeDaub as the ADPC Security Advisor


In essence, the proposal does not provide a choice of auditor;
The proposed company is not among the top 10 most famous and best. It may even be the best, but there must always be a choice.


ote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

GovHack at ETH CC (Brussels)


We support public goods for the development of Arbitrum


Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally

Pilot Phase: M&A for Arbitrum DAO


An interesting initiative for the development of Arbitrum and diversification of treasury


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Grant Request - Curve Finance


We support this project due to its liquidation innovation in lending
We also welcome the owner’s participation in this grant


Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally

Pilot Phase: M&A for Arbitrum DAO


An important initiative for the development of Arbitrum and diversification of treasury


Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally

Front-end interface to force transaction inclusion during sequencer downtime


That interface will make the forced inclusion process more straightforward and understandable.
This will allow regular users to use Arbitrum with greater security.


Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally

Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)


This initiative will reduce costs for multisig

The proposal also took into account our comments:
increase by one vote in all options:
i. 6/12: <$1M
ii. 7/12: $1M-$5M
iii. 8/12: $5M-$10m
iii. 9/12 $10M-$50M

The possibility of expelling a member of the MMC by internal voting is also excluded


Vote: FOR Implement MSS
Platform: Snapshot

MUX STIP Bridge Challenge


After the end of the grant, there will be a 60% reduction of TVL to $34 million.
In general, I think that project keeps users only through grants.

Also, project received 3,000,000 ARB under the Double-Down program.
55% of the grant will be used to reduce trading commissions for positions.
Those, the commissions themselves come up with the protocols, and then reduce them at the expense of the Arbitrum. It turns out that the project inflates the commission, and only a grant can even out the situation


Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

Stargate STIP Bridge Challenge


I support decision of project:
50% to stimulate the USDC Stargate pool on Arbitrum
50% for gas discounts


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Solv STIP Bridge Challenge


TVL during the grant period increased from $3 to $90 m
I support:
50% to Solv vaults on Arbitrum (including SolvBTC).
50% to incentivize the creation of the SolvBTC liquidity pool


Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

Sanko GameCorp STIP Bridge Challenge


Project monthly inflow max $34,000.
But project wants $250,000. It seems to me that with such indicators this is too much of a request.


Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

Tide STIP Bridge Challenge


I don’t know how I feel about such projects, and does it help Arbitrum - I don’t know.
On the other hand, they help other projects distribute incentives, including helping to eliminate sybils.


Vote: ABSTAIN
Platform: Snapshot

KyberSwap STIP Bridge Challenge


Last time the project was hacked during the grant period.
Accordingly, there are no results for the past 1,500,000 ARB.

In their application they did not write a word about the fact that they fixed the code error or conducted any new audit of adjustments to their code


Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

Gains Network STIP Addendum


The requested grant amount of 2,250,000 ARB is too high
From January to today, TVL has decreased from $40 million to $18 million.
According to their results, only 6.5k traders participated in the project in six months. Not enough for such a large grant; I think that the last grant did not produce results.


Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

Boost (Prev. RabbitHole) STIP Addendum


The same situation like with Tide
I don’t see much benefit from this project


Vote: ABSTAIN
Platform: Snapshot