Cp0x Delegate Communication Thread

Voting Rationale & Governance Calls Delegate Statements
,
41

Thales Protocol STIP Addendum

From January to now, TVL has dropped from $2 million to $1 million.
Of these, Arbitrum - 400k.
For such a small TVL, 200,000 ARB is too much of a request, and besides, they consider Polygon to be the main chain - as it is written on their website

Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

1 Like
42

Savvy DAO STIP Addendum

The report says that TVL increased from 1 to 1.5 million $
But on Defillama.com I see the opposite situation - a decrease from $1 to $700k.
They are asking too much, it seems to me, and they did not achieve any results with the help of the previous grant.

Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

43

Stake DAO STIP Addendum

Despite the fact that the project started the last grant with a long delay, they have a stable TVL and a useful product.
They want to spend the new grant not only on Curve, but also on Pendle products at Arbitrum

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

44

Furucombo STIP Addendum

The grant request is too large given the lack of clear growth in use.
Previous grant was 60k, and now project wants 350k.
Also, there was a lot of outrage on the forum about non-payment of the previous grant.

Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

45

Socket Bridge STIP Addendum

Grant expects to use ARB to provide discounts to users (80% discount on connection + gas fee) in the Socket API/SDK
I don’t like the approach of using grants to offset fees or the cost of the project itself. Thus, the project can charge a higher and non-competitive cost through the grant.
There is no normal link in the report; it is unclear to me how they obtained this data. There is only a screenshot of their calculations, which by default I do not trust.
So I don’t understand whether there are positive results from the past grant or not

Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

46

Angle DAO STIP Addendum

The project will increase its TVL from the beginning of the grant to now from 300k to 2 million.
I like that they plan to spend the grant on the USDA launched and profitable stUSD - 20%

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

47

OpenOcean STIP Addendum

The report states good performance and an increase in trading volumes from 32 million to 105 million per month.
I couldn’t find where to check, all the statistics are available for all networks, and there, plus or minus, it’s all the same, about 50-70 million per day, Arbitrum accounts for a small part, but I can’t seem to say anything bad about this project.
I consider it useful for Arbitrum

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

48

Thetanuts Finance STIP Addendum

TVL grew from almost zero to $3-4 million, and remained there even after the incentives ended.

I support the distribution of ARB incentives to promote the new Pendle PT LRT storage facilities on Arbitrum

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

49

Dolomite STIP Addendum

Good growth of TVL from 8 million to 40 million
Properly distributed incentives with ARB locking and vesting

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

50

Umami Finance STIP Addendum

TVL grew from 4 to 11 million.
Made the same distribution as Dolomite with lock and vesting

BUT, there are doubts about this project due to the past situation
https://www.coindesk.com/web3/2023/02/09/umami-finance-ceo-dumps-all-tokens-after-week-long-drama-leaving-crypto-hopefuls-stranded/

Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

51

Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties

I think that it’s an internal matter of the commission to delegate the work of the commission to external researchers

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

52

Catalyze Gaming Ecosystem Growth on Arbitrum

It is a mistake to spend 200 million until the DAO has researched what exactly it wants to get as a result.
First, it was necessary to allocate funds for research into what games needed to be developed or developed. Is there a need for new games, or should existing ones be improved for web3.

And wasting 200 million ARB is too much expense without any guarantee of usefulness for Arbitrum

Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Tally

53

Constitutional AIP - Security Council Improvement Proposal

We voted FOR this 4 months ago in https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth/proposal/0xc591f79422bf26faf13055df098142569785c04316fdae5be993e282721eb717
Increasing the voting threshold for the security council from 7/12 to 9/12. This is correct solution.

Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally

54

ArbitrumDAO Contribution; Safeguarding Software Developers’ Rights

Earlier, 2 months ago, they voted to allocate funds to protect developers.
Results:

  • 38.8% for allocating 500,000 ARB
  • 37.5% for allocating 1,000,000 ARB
    But for some reason this vote is 1,000,000 for voting in Tally.
    In other cases, I think I would be indignant a lot, but here, for a good cause, I don’t have to be too indignant.

Despite the change in the amount, I vote for help for software developers

Vote: FOR
Platform: Tally

55

Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives

  1. The calculation model requires 2.4 million ARB, but the request is only for 1.9 million ARB.
    In this regard, there is no way to understand exactly how rewards will be distributed.
  2. Fee of the project is compensated - 80% in the amount of $816,000. I believe that compensation for the project commission should be excluded. This is something that goes directly to the project. That is, the project receives a significant part of the grant, which it most likely would not have received without the grant.

Vote: AGAINST
Platform: Snapshot

56

AIP: Support RIP-7212 for Account Abstraction Wallets (ArbOS 30)

In general, given the fact that this is a update for Ethereum, there is no choice and this will have a positive impact on the ability to attract people to Arbitrum

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

57

Set up a Sub-Committee for the Security Services Subsidy Fund

I see no problem in delegating this work to a subcommittee

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

58

AIP: Nova Fee Router Proposal (ArbOS 30)

The idea is good, I would like to eliminate unnecessary voting on obvious issues
I just don’t understand why this wasn’t done initially

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

59

AIP: Activate Stylus and Enable Next-Gen WebAssembly Smart Contracts (ArbOS 30)

In my opinion, this is a cool change and will attract many new programmers to Arbitrum in C++, Rust, and so on as it develops

Vote: FOR
Platform: Snapshot

60

Election of STEP Program Manager

  • particula.io
    Large professional team in the financial sector and audit, but little experience in crypto and therefore did not vote for this team
  • bluechip.org
    A small team of a former poker player, an economics professor and an accountant. It seems to me that this is not enough to be a manager and therefore I did not vote for this team
  • Steakhouse.financial
    A large professional team with a financial background and extensive experience in crypto. Voted for them.
  • avantgarde.finance
    The team has been working with Uniswap, The Graph, Nexus Mutual, Paraswap for more than 5 years. Voted for them.

Votes:
50% FOR Steakhouse.financial
50% FOR avantgarde.finance
Platform: Snapshot

[DIP v1.0]Delegate Incentive Program Questions and Feedback