Delegate Incentive Program Results (MAY 2024)

We are proud to announce the initial outcomes of the third month of the Delegate Incentive Program. We can now share results with the Arbitrum ecosystem.

:family_man_woman_girl_boy: May Participants

For May’s iteration of the program, 48 participants enrolled, out of which 44 met the necessary requirements to qualify.

You can see the full list here.

:gear:Parameters Breakdown

:yellow_circle:Snapshot Voting

During the month, there were a total of 40 Snapshot Votes, which were considered for the assignment of scores by SV. It is important to note that only those proposals that ended in May were counted. These are the proposals that were taken into account:

  1. 15 LTIPP Votations.
  2. 18 STIP Votations.
  3. GovHack at ETH CC (Brussels)
  4. Grant Request - Curve Finance
  5. Proposal for Approval of DeDaub as the ADPC Security Advisor
  6. Pilot Phase: M&A for Arbitrum DAO
  7. Arbitrum Multi-sig Support Service (MSS)
  8. Streamlining the LTIPP Bounties
  9. Kwenta x Perennial: Arbitrum Onboarding Incentives

:large_blue_circle:Tally Voting

For this month, there were a total of 3 Tally Votes considered for TV scoring. It is important to note that only those proposals that ended in May were counted. These are the proposals that were considered:

  1. Grant Request - Curve Finance
  2. GovHack at ETH CC (Brussels)
  3. Double-Down on STIP Successes (STIP-Bridge)

:orange_circle:Communication Rationale

As stated in our forum post, LTIPP Communication Rationales won’t be taken into consideration for this parameter.

For the CR, the published rationals of all the votes of the month were considered, taking into account Snapshot and Tally, that is to say, that to obtain the maximum qualification in this aspect a delegate had to express his rational of all the votes of the month, in other words, 28 (25 Snapshot + 3 Tally).

:red_circle:Commenting in proposals

25 proposals were considered. These proposals were the ones that went through Snapshot excluding the LTIPP proposals.

:memo:May Results

You can see the dashboard with the results implemented by Karma here.

Of all the participating delegates, 29 were eligible to receive compensation.

Delegate Address Tally Profile PARB
mcfly 0x821f2b40d965b81202b181Aba1c7a380C49Ed675 mcfly profile 4.740,00
cp0x 0x6f9BB7e454f5B3eb2310343f0E99269dC2BB8A1d cp0x Profile 4.590,00
404DAO 0xe93d59cc0bcecfd4ac204827ef67c5266079e2b5 404DAO Profile 4.340,00
Bob-Rossi 0xb29A655f3D67B2B6724Fb22B2C2303cB660c946B Bob Rossi Profile 4.330,00
BlockworksResearch 0xA160b58a0108BC139Aafc1dC67846fcc2aD6D4Cd BlockworksResearch Profile 4.290,00
MaxLomu 0xd333Bc5c9670C9cEb18f9A2CF02C6E86807a8227 MaxLomu Profile 4.270,00
PGov 0x3fb19771947072629c8eee7995a2ef23b72d4c8a PGov Profile 4.230,00
UADP 0x8326D18edfC50B4335113C33b25116ec268FF3fE UADP Profile 4.210,00
BristolBlockchain 0x43D3938Ebd74106e2d177f9A304C1E9f914f2b52 BristolBlockchain Profile 4.083,75
DAOplomats 0xd4879f876eE383067F80ACAdBE283B93141908e9 DAOplomats 4.031,96
0x_ultra 0x04330a444F9D051713b13c934d478a552165C205 0x_Ultra Profile 4.030,00
StableLab 0x9c489E4efba90A67299C1097a8628e233C33BB7B StableLab Profile 4.015,36
Jojo 0x1de39f894c2DC773C8A11862F58165EcC7611C91 Jojo Profile 3.840,00
L2BEAT 0x41626BA92c0C2a1aD38fC83920300434082B1870 Profile L2beat 3.835,30
Gauntlet 0xFd2892eFf2615C9F29AF83Fb528fAf3fE41c1426 Gauntlet Profile 3.810,00
HiringDevs.eth 0x22aA1F4173b826451763EbfCE22cf54A0603163c hiringdevs.eth Profile 3.786,25
jameskbh 0x714D8b5874b3a6a69f289f4e857F4C9670074296 Jameskbh Profile 3.780,71
Tane 0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7 Tane Profile 3.765,36
PrincetonBlockchain 0x18BF1a97744539a348304E9d266aAc7d446a1582 PrincetonBlockchain Profile 3.743,04
0xCasio 0x47E98aA12dB2017295d33e94002521820442F827 0xCasio profile 3.730,00
Karpatkey 0x583E3EDc26E1B8620341bce90547197bfE2c1ddD Karpatkey Profile 3.660,00
TreasureDAO 0x0eB5B03c0303f2F47cD81d7BE4275AF8Ed347576 TreasureDAO Profile 3.644,05
Frisson 0xb5B069370Ef24BC67F114e185D185063CE3479f8 Frisson Profile 3.381,25
ITUblockchain 0xBEC643BD5b7F5e9190617CA4187ef0455950C51C ITUblockchain profile 3.200,12
Bobbay 0x5a35923ed6950eff4412ef6d27cea8b1d405a844 Bobbay Profile 3.144,05
Savvy DeFi 0x4f54Cab19B61138e3c622a0bD671C687481eC030 Savvy DeFi Profile 3.128,45
olimpio 0xF4B0556B9B6F53E00A1FDD2b0478Ce841991D8fA olimpo Profile 3.115,18
GFXLabs 0xa6e8772af29b29B9202a073f8E36f447689BEef6 GFX Labs Profile 3.039,05
Kuiqian.eth 0xf3FE8c6c75bE4afB2F8200Fc77339abE4D7CFF33 Kuiqian Profile 3.000,00
Total 110.808,51

:crown:Bonus Points

There were no qualified delegates to receive Bonus Points this month.

:moneybag:Costs

We track all cost data for greater transparency in our Payment Distribution Thread.

:coin:Incentives to delegates (May)

According this the results presented before the total cost destined to the delegates this month will it be 110.808,51 ARB

:question:Why haven’t they finished paying for the months of March and April?

That’s because there are some delegates that still haven’t completed their KYC process and they still remain unpaid.

When the kyc will be completed, the remaining payments will be sent to the delegates.

:new:New Members of the Program

As we said in previous posts, any delegate can apply to the program anytime.

We have two new participants that will be part of it from the next month:

:rotating_light:[CALL TO ACTION!] Dispute Period

As stated in the proposal, delegates have 2 days to express their disagreement with the results presented by the Incentive System Administrator.

To raise a dispute, delegates should do so by posting a message in the forum using the following template:

Title: Dispute

User name

Reason for dispute (please detail)

:man_student::woman_student:Conclusions

This month has been the busiest so far in terms of data collection for the Delegate Incentive Program. We are delighted to see how delegate activity has evolved, demonstrating increased engagement and participation in governance processes.

Given the high volume of Communication Rationales (CR) collected this month, we acknowledge the possibility of errors. We invite all delegates to double-check our table (link tabla publica) their recorded CRs to ensure accuracy.

Here you can see all the information related to CP and CR.

If you want to give any feedback, don’t hesitate to do it in this thread.

4 Likes

Great job!
I was so close to receive compensation.
Keep going!

1 Like

Hi, good work,
however, I see that all delegates recieved about 0 point for CP (COMMENTING PROPOSAL)

As for me, I commented on all the proposals (25) this month, but I see that you only counted 5 out of 25

Please, count all of our point for commenting correctly.

1 Like

Hey @cp0x Thank you for let us know this, we double- checked and updated your score. Have in mind that we just considered the high impact comments as we expressed here.

Thanks again! Have a great day!

1 Like

Hi @SEEDGov! Thanks for managing and organizing the program. Great work!

It’s a very minor one, but…

Dispute: a calculation of our CR

Reason for dispute: Missing count for our comment on the Curve proposal as below.

Hey! thanks for reaching us.

Actually, that comment was counted on our calculations as one of the Tally’s Communication Rationales. You can check it in our public table.

The Missing CR is the Rationale from that Snapshot Votation.

Understood, thanks for clarification!

Thanks for the update @SEEDGov

As an FYI, @WinVerse are both part of the DAOplomats delegation, so we’d like to request you to consider either of our comments while making your calculations

2 Likes

hey, why are there only 5 delegates opted-in this month?

I think it’s because they don’t finish previous month yet

Looks it was updated! thanks sir!

1 Like

I don’t see any updates, but we have enough time