[DIP v1.0]Delegate Incentive Program Results (September 2024)

Governance Delegate Incentives Program
1

We are proud to announce the initial outcomes of the sixth month of the Delegate Incentive Program. We can now share results with the Arbitrum ecosystem.

:family_man_woman_girl_boy: September Participants

For September’s iteration of the program, 58 participants enrolled, 54 of whom met the necessary requirements to qualify.

578×500 78.5 KB

You can see the full list here.

:gear: Parameters Breakdown

:yellow_circle: Snapshot Voting

During the month, there were a total of 14 Snapshot Votes, which were considered for the assignment of scores by SV. It is important to note that only those proposals that ended in September were counted. These are the proposals that were considered:

  1. [Constitutional] Extend Delay on L2Time Lock
  2. STIP-Bridge Operational Budget
  3. [Replace Oversight Committee with MSS] Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon
  4. ArbitrumDAO Procurement Committee Phase II
  5. [Pyth Network] Arbitrum LTIPP Extension Request
  6. Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum
  7. Synthetix LTIP Grant Extension Request
  8. Fund the Stylus Sprint
  9. [Aave DAO] LTIPP Grant Extension Request
  10. Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy
  11. Terms of Tenure for STEP program manager
  12. ArbitrumDAO Off-site
  13. GovHack Devcon in Bangkok - Hack Humanity
  14. [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget

:large_blue_circle: Tally Voting

For this month, a total of 3 Tally Votes were considered for TV scoring. It is important to note that only those proposals that ended in September counted. It’s important to clarify that proposals with the tag [CANCELED] are not counted for DIP. These are the proposals that were considered:

  1. Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator
  2. ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance
  3. Delegate to Voter Enfranchisement Pool — Event Horizon

:green_circle: Communication Rationale

For the CR, the published rationals of all the votes of the month were considered, taking into account Snapshot and Tally, that is to say, that to obtain the maximum qualification in this aspect a delegate had to express his rational of all the votes of the month, in other words, 17 (14 Snapshot + 3 Tally).

:orange_circle: Commenting in proposals

The 15 Snapshot proposals were considered.

Additional Note

Delegate Incentive Program Proposals will not be considered for incentives, so we won’t consider the Delegate Incentive Program for this month’s results.

:clipboard: September Results

1135×449 25.6 KB

You can see the dashboard with the results implemented by Karma here.

Of all the participating delegates, 37 were eligible to receive compensation.

Delegate Address PARB
L2BEAT 0x41626BA92c0C2a1aD38fC83920300434082B1870 4.715,76
BlockworksResearch 0xA160b58a0108BC139Aafc1dC67846fcc2aD6D4Cd 4.588,61
Jojo 0x1de39f894c2DC773C8A11862F58165EcC7611C91 4.522,86
cp0x 0x6f9BB7e454f5B3eb2310343f0E99269dC2BB8A1d 4.465,00
404DAO 0xe93d59cc0bcecfd4ac204827ef67c5266079e2b5 4.303,57
Larva 0x5f38BB373dccB91AD9Fd3727C2b9BaF6DF9332D3 4.287,14
olimpio 0xf4b0556b9b6f53e00a1fdd2b0478ce841991d8fa 4.250,00
Tekr0x.eth 0x5FfD23B1B0350debB17A2cB668929aC5f76d0E18 4.230,00
0x_ultra 0x04330a444F9D051713b13c934d478a552165C205 4.217,14
Bob-Rossi 0xb29A655f3D67B2B6724Fb22B2C2303cB660c946B 4.200,00
Griff Green 0x839395e20bbB182fa440d08F850E6c7A8f6F0780 4.156,47
DAOplomats 0x9b651B16DA2286aa98196228496A0976Ea69867b 4.140,08
Frisson 0xb5B069370Ef24BC67F114e185D185063CE3479f8 4.102,94
jameskbh 0x714D8b5874b3a6a69f289f4e857F4C9670074296 4.070,80
Tane 0xB79294D00848a3A4C00c22D9367F19B4280689D7 4.070,80
PGov 0x3FB19771947072629C8EEE7995a2eF23B72d4C8A 4.064,29
Gauntlet 0xFd2892eFf2615C9F29AF83Fb528fAf3fE41c1426 4.003,57
TreasureDAO 0x0eB5B03c0303f2F47cD81d7BE4275AF8Ed347576 4.003,11
UADP 0x8326D18edfC50B4335113C33b25116ec268FF3fE 4.000,04
MaxLomu 0xd333Bc5c9670C9cEb18f9A2CF02C6E86807a8227 3.996,55
Lampros Labs 0xa2d590fee197c0b614fe7c3e10303327f38c0dc3 3.921,43
Angela 0xD227Eb51Ab83bA818af3BD2b88ad6e7eD00F08D2 3.900,04
PennBlockchain 0x070341aA5Ed571f0FB2c4a5641409B1A46b4961b 3.860,13
Vertex Protocol 0x657e6d2073A99aF61952beb7EE564169616b90C1 3.740,00
Mehdi_eth 0x5F367BF126FDa56D88BA88a8978D5496c66B3569 3.722,35
StableLab 0x9c489E4efba90A67299C1097a8628e233C33BB7B 3.688,82
MUX Protocol 0xdC8413b2b24ace2b0Bf39C21Bc677f818458535a 3.583,38
GFXLabs 0xa6e8772af29b29B9202a073f8E36f447689BEef6 3.531,60
mcfly 0x821f2b40d965b81202b181Aba1c7a380C49Ed675 3.474,54
Argonaut 0x21b3B193B71680E2fAfe40768C03a0Fd305EFa75 3.432,94
Bobbay 0x5a35923eD6950EFF4412eF6d27CeA8b1d405a844 3.428,70
Alex Lumley 0xA9cD2D7Fe90321BadD16ebf6b5dB7A6Be099ef2E 3.423,38
0xDonPepe 0x010DC5440ad49f9Ec0Dd325b622d9FD225944ee4 3.413,03
Kuiqian.eth 0xf3FE8c6c75bE4afB2F8200Fc77339abE4D7CFF33 3.341,34
0xTALVO 0x82254Db8AeAB5dB15126cAe6Cb48591c3BD52340 3.299,54
ITUblockchain 0xBEC643BD5b7F5e9190617CA4187ef0455950C51C 3.164,71
Bruce 0x88Bd639d6B029596B029c61490F29f57b0bF4a3f 3.094,20
144.408,85

:gift: Bonus Points

No Bonus Points were given this month.

:moneybag: Costs

We track all cost data for greater transparency in our Payment Distribution Thread…

:white_check_mark: Incentives to delegates (September)

According this the results presented before the total cost destined to the delegates this month will be 145.064,31 ARBs.

You can check our Public Table to see the detailed breakdown of delegates results.

:family_woman_woman_girl_boy: New Members of the Program

As we said in previous posts, any delegate can apply to the program anytime.

We have three new participants that will be part of the program next month:

:rotating_light: [CALL TO ACTION!] Dispute Period

As stated in the proposal, delegates have 2 days to express their disagreement with the results presented by the Incentive System Administrator.

To raise a dispute, delegates should do so by posting a message in the forum using the following template:

Title: Dispute

User name

Reason for dispute (please detail)

7 Likes
2

Dispute

jameskbh

Hello! I would like to point out that this CR is missing:

3

Dispute

cp0x

Hi, I have a long message and in order not to fill it up with too much information, I sent a personal message to you

4

Thank you for your work. It’s excellent.

5

Dispute

Tane

Reason for dispute:

Two CR points are missing for the comments below:

6

Dispute

0xDonPepe

I see from the public table that I’m missing 4 CRs, but it doesn’t specify which ones. I’ve reviewed all 17 of my votes, and each includes a CR. Could you let me know which ones are missing? That way, I can help track them down faster.

7

Dispute

0xTALVO.ETH_MTY

I noticed a discrepancy in the public table where two CRs appear to be missing.

This is my Tread to verify September Proposals
0xTALVO.ETH_MTY Delegate Communication Thread - Governance / Delegate Statements - Arbitrum

8

Hi

Please, write down the links with the CRs to double-check. Thanks!

9

Hey guys

Score has been adjusted with the missing CRs. Thanks for your patience and cooperation.

Thanks for noticing, we adjusted your score with the missing CR.

Thanks for pointing! We adjusted the parameters.

2 Likes
10

Snapshot:

  1. Constitutional - Extend Delay on L2Time Lock - #9 by 0xDonPepe
  2. STIP-Bridge Operational Budget - #9 by 0xDonPepe
  3. Delegate to a public access, public good citizen enfranchisement pool through Event Horizon - #73 by 0xDonPepe
  4. Arbitrum DAO Procurement Committee: Phase II Proposal - #37 by 0xDonPepe
  5. [RFC] Pyth Network Arbitrum LTIPP Extension Request - #18 by 0xDonPepe
  6. Enhancing Multichain Governance: Upgrading RARI Governance Token on Arbitrum - #17 by 0xDonPepe
  7. [RFC] Synthetix LTIP Grant Extension Request - #12 by 0xDonPepe
  8. [RFC] Fund The Stylus Sprint - #10 by 0xDonPepe
  9. RFC: Aave DAO LTIPP Grant Extension Request - #5 by 0xDonPepe
  10. Constitutional AIP: Proposal to adopt Timeboost, a new transaction ordering policy - #53 by 0xDonPepe
  11. **Non-Constitutional: Terms of Tenure for STEP Program Manager** - #22 by 0xDonPepe
  12. ArbitrumDAO Off-site - Directional proposal - #64 by 0xDonPepe
  13. GovHack Devcon in Bangkok - Hack Humanity - #45 by 0xDonPepe
  14. [Non-Constitutional] Funds to Bolster Foundation’s Strategic Partnerships Budget - #20 by 0xDonPepe

Tally:

  1. AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - #32 by 0xDonPepe
  2. ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance - #143 by 0xDonPepe
  3. Delegate to a public access, public good citizen enfranchisement pool through Event Horizon - #73 by 0xDonPepe
11

Hi @0xDonPepe! Remember you can always check our Public Table that we publish in alongside our monthly results.

We’ve added the missing ones (Tally 1 & 2, Snapshot 3).
Snapshot 9 (AAVE LTIPP Extension) was already counted as a CP (commenting in proposal) instead of a CR.

You can check updated results in Karma Dashboard.

1 Like
12

Here are 2 votes that I believe were not verified:

  1. AIP: Funds to bootstrap the first BoLD validator - #11 by 0xTALVO.ETH_MTY

  2. ARB Staking: Unlock ARB Utility and Align Governance - #19 by 0xTALVO.ETH_MTY

13

Hey, thanks for noticing.

Unfortunately, the dates of both comments show that they are from when the proposal was in Snapshot. Also, it’s important to clarify that those comments are not communication rationales since there’s no clarification on what the delegate voted, besides expressing an opinion.

Those comments qualify more as ‘Commenting on Proposal’ (CP) rather than ‘Communication Rationales’ but CP are only considered when the proposal is in Snapshot.

1 Like
14

Oh ok ok, I understand now, thanks for the feedback @SEEDGov

1 Like