Voted AGAINST
I don’t see a clear case here for damages, and knowing that OP grants are locked up to a year I don’t see how these practices should result in damages being paid by the DAO. Ugly cashgrab imo.
Voted In favour, yes to onchain mechanism
It’s not a big ask so in my eyes it’s a high risk of doing nothing, high reward type proposal. We have the funds to take these risks. I particularly liked the onchain component because we have a big problem in this DAO of not looking at data and just reinventing the wheel each time, so the onchain component makes sense to me in terms of reusability.