Tané Delegate Communication Thread

[Tane]

Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget (Onchain)

Request to Increase the Stylus Sprint Committee’s Budget

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We maintain the support made at the Snapshot phase.

TMC Recommendation (Snapshot)

TMC’s Proposed Allocations

We vote for “#1 Deploy Both Strategies” as the first choice and #3, #2, #4, Abstain for the rest in order. The selected partners, Karpatkey, Avantgarde (and Myso), and Gauntlet, have demonstrated strong track records in managing treasury assets in other DAOs. We believe they (Gauntlet only for stable) should be able to manage both stablecoin and ARB strategies to be executed with a focus on risk-adjusted returns and liquidity. Regarding the stablecoin management, it’s very critical to carry ou…

[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp (Onchain)

[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Onboarding V2: A Governance Bootcamp

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We would like to continue to support this program and express gratitude to @RikaGoldberg and the contributors to this proposal, especially on the additional efforts in reaching out potential partners and continuous updates to address feedback from delegates. We would also like to point out a couple of perspectives in this proposal as a critical direction that the DAO needs to consider: Reasonable cost, real value We believe ~$171k in ARB is a solid deal for w…

[CONSTITUTIONAL] - Adopt Timeboost + Nova Fee Sweep (Onchain)

AIP: Timeboost + Nova Fee Sweep

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We confirmed that the onchain action is related to the Nova fee sweep as instructed and the deployment of the proxy contract and ExpressLaneAuction implementation and continue to support the experimental initiative.

GMC’s Preferred Allocations (7,500 ETH) (Snapshot)

GMC's Preferred Choices for 7,500 ETH RFP

We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. We believe the revised proposal from the GMC represents a well-balanced allocation, thoughtfully distributing treasury assets between established protocols and an Arbitrum-native project. As Blockworks noted, this initiative doesn’t necessarily need to prioritize exclusively supporting Arbitrum-native projects. Instead, it’s commendable that a balanced approach was chosen, which is to allocate a modest yet meaningful portion to Camelot while dedicating the …

[CONSTITUTIONAL] Proposal: For Arbitrum DAO to register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router (Snapshot)

[CONSTITUTIONAL] Proposal: For Arbitrum DAO to register the Sky Custom Gateway contracts in the Router

We vote FOR the proposal on Snapshot. As stated in our comment, we have no issue with the registrations of USDS and sUSDS tokens in the Router contracts. Also stated in the original comment and raised by other delegates, we would like to see a more streamlined process of requesting registrations of the tokens in the Router contracts in the future, but it’s not affecting the integrity of this proposal.

[NON-CONSTITUTIONAL] Arbitrum Audit Program (Onchain)

Arbitrum Audit Program

We vote FOR the proposal on Tally. We acknowledge that, after showing our general support on Snapshot, the program managers include publishing quarterly transparency reports. We will follow up on a possible permanent audit subsidy program based on the results from them as well as seeing the clear situation the OpCo establishment.

[Tane]

March 2025 Member Election Phase (Onchain)

March 2025 Member Election Phase

We voted for Bartek.eth Fred Michael Lewellen Yoav.eth Rationale: Our decision-making process focused primarily on three key criteria, with geographic diversity as a secondary consideration: Deep Security Expertise: This was paramount. The Security Council needs members capable of implementing rapid upgrades and fixes when vulnerabilities arise, requiring significant technical expertise. We highly valued not just general technical understanding, but specific knowledge of security practices …